Santiago Chile Clay Atp 250 Quarterfinals

Yannick Hanfmann vs Vilius Gaubas: AI Prediction | Games, Aces & Double Faults

Yannick Hanfmann

Rank: #81
51%
VS

Vilius Gaubas

Rank: #107
49%
Expected Total Games: 23.0
Predicted Winner: Yannick Hanfmann

Player Metrics

Yannick Hanfmann

Form Index: 49.5
ELO Rating: 662.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1568.7
Current Fatigue (minutes): 170.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 4.4
Clay: 5.4
Grass: 5.5
Serve Rating: 75.7
Return Rating: 53.7

Vilius Gaubas

Form Index: 54.3
ELO Rating: 482.4
Glicko2 Rating: 1548.9
Current Fatigue (minutes): 433.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 3.4
Clay: 5.3
Grass: 3.8
Serve Rating: 96.4
Return Rating: 92.9

Recent Matches

Yannick Hanfmann

  • Last Match: vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli (2-0) clay Santiago 96 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Dusan Lajovic (1-0) clay Santiago 74 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo (1-2) clay Rio 169 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva (2-0) clay Rio 117 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Carlos Alcaraz (0-3) hard Australian Open 174 min

Vilius Gaubas

  • Last Match: vs Dino Prizmic (2-1) clay Santiago 182 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Matias Soto (2-0) clay Santiago 95 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Alex Barrena (0-2) clay Santiago 70 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva (2-0) clay Santiago 86 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry (0-2) clay Rio 127 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Yannick Hanfmann
vs
0
Vilius Gaubas
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Quarterfinal action in Santiago, Chile sees Yannick Hanfmann face Vilius Gaubas on clay at a 250-level event. The model narrowly favors Hanfmann, projecting him to win with a 51.22% probability against Gaubas’s 48.78%, and forecasts a fairly short contest of about 23.03 total games.

Match Analysis

Hanfmann arrives as the higher-ranked player (No. 81) with a markedly stronger Elo (662.5) than Gaubas (Elo 482.4), suggesting more consistent results over time. His form index sits at 49.5 versus Gaubas’s 54.3, so recent momentum is slightly with the Lithuanian. Fatigue is a clear differentiator: Hanfmann has logged 170 minutes in the event, while Gaubas has accumulated 433 minutes, a large gap that can matter on demanding clay courts. Both sport almost identical surface strength indices (Hanfmann 5.37, Gaubas 5.27), indicating neither has a pronounced clay-specialist profile according to the proprietary measure. Serve and return metrics paint an intriguing matchup. Gaubas posts a much higher mean serve index (96.39) compared to Hanfmann (75.70) — a gap well over 5 points — and his mean return index (92.88) far outstrips Hanfmann’s (53.68), also a substantial margin. Those numbers suggest Gaubas can both hold serve aggressively and threaten opponents’ service games when fresh. Over the last three matches Hanfmann has impressed in Santiago with straight-set wins over Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Dusan Lajovic after a tough three-set loss in Rio, while Gaubas has won two in Santiago (including a marathon 182-minute match) and suffered a prior quick loss. The recent ledger favors both men in different ways: Hanfmann for efficiency and fresher legs, Gaubas for high-impact serving and returning when not fatigued.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 23.0 Most likely outcome: 23 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for the match sits at 15.35 total, with an expected double faults figure of 3.91. Clay’s slower, higher-bouncing surface typically reduces ace counts and can increase expected double faults as matches wear on. Given Gaubas’s significantly higher serve rating, he likely accounts for a large share of the predicted aces, but the surface will temper raw serving power and could push his double faults higher if fatigue becomes a factor.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 15.3 Most likely: 15 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 3.9 Most likely: 3 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Final Prediction

Hanfmann’s edge comes from a better Elo and considerably fresher legs after lighter court time in the event, factors that offset Gaubas’s superior serve and return indices. The key factor to watch is Gaubas’s serving effectiveness under fatigue—if his serve sustains its potency, the match stays razor-close; if not, Hanfmann’s steadiness should decide the outcome.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel