S Hertogenbosch Netherlands Grass Atp 250 Round of 32

Otto Virtanen vs Kamil Majchrzak: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Otto Virtanen

Rank: #158
39%
VS

Kamil Majchrzak

Rank: #76
61%
Expected Total Games: 26.7
Predicted Winner: Kamil Majchrzak

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Otto Virtanen

Form Index: 32.7
ELO Rating: 1500.7
Glicko2 Rating: 1559.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 10.2
Clay: 11.2
Grass: 10.0
Serve Rating: 95.2
Return Rating: 90.3

Kamil Majchrzak

Form Index: 30.4
ELO Rating: 1576.9
Glicko2 Rating: 1614.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 27.4
Clay: 7.3
Grass: 19.5
Serve Rating: 94.4
Return Rating: 87.5

Recent Matches

Otto Virtanen

  • Last Match: vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer (1-2) clay Rome 152 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Titouan Droguet (1-2) clay Madrid 97 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Carlos Alcaraz (0-2) clay Barcelona 85 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Alexandre Muller (2-0) clay Barcelona 75 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Aleksandar Vukic (2-1) clay Barcelona 151 min

Kamil Majchrzak

  • Last Match: vs Alejandro Tabilo (0-3) clay Roland Garros 174 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli (1-2) clay Hamburg 119 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Marco Trungelliti (0-2) clay Marrakech 107 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo (2-1) clay Marrakech 154 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Quentin Halys (0-2) hard Miami 78 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Otto Virtanen
vs
0
Kamil Majchrzak
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands — Round of 32 on grass at an ATP 250 event. Kamil Majchrzak is the projected winner against Otto Virtanen, with probabilities of 60.88% for Majchrzak and 39.12% for Virtanen. The model expects a relatively short encounter, about 26.72 total games.

Match Analysis

On paper Majchrzak holds the clearer ranking and Elo edge (rank 76 and Elo 1576.94) compared with Virtanen (rank 158 and Elo 1500.66). Both players arrive with similar, modest form indices (Virtanen 32.69, Majchrzak 30.42) and zero tournament fatigue. Majchrzak’s surface strength index on grass (19.48) is noticeably higher than Virtanen’s (10.05), suggesting he projects better adaptation to the low, fast bounce. Serve metrics are comparable — Virtanen’s mean serve index is 95.16 versus Majchrzak’s 94.42 — so there isn’t a meaningful serve-rating gap to single-handedly decide the match. Return indices are also close (90.29 vs 87.50). Recent results offer little momentum for either man: both have recorded losses in their last three matches, all on clay. Virtanen dropped matches in Barcelona, Madrid and Rome, managing only a single set in two of those three. Majchrzak has also struggled on clay, including a heavy loss at Roland Garros and two other defeats in Hamburg and Marrakech. Those clay-court trends temper expectations but may carry limited predictive weight on grass, where serve and quick point construction become more decisive.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 26.7 Most likely outcome: 26 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Otto Virtanen - Kamil Majchrzak) -0.8 Most likely spread: -1 (Kamil Majchrzak wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. Positive values indicate Otto Virtanen winning more games, negative values indicate Kamil Majchrzak winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction sits at 14.68 for the match and the predicted aces should be concentrated on service holds and quick points typical of grass. The double faults prediction is 5.81 — the expected double faults figure is modest but relevant in tight service games. Because both players post similar serve indices there is no single server expected to dominate the ace count; surface conditions are the primary driver of the higher ace total.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 14.7 Most likely: 14 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.8 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Otto Virtanen versus Kamil Majchrzak. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

47.9% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Otto Virtanen's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (38.3%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Otto Virtanen's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Majchrzak’s higher ranking, superior Elo and better grass surface index give him the edge in this matchup. The key factor to watch will be serve efficacy and early break opportunities on grass — whoever holds under pressure should determine the short, sharp script this match is likely to follow.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel