Rio Brazil Clay Atp 500 Round of 32

Dino Prizmic vs Francesco Passaro: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Dino Prizmic

Rank: #122
46%
VS

Francesco Passaro

Rank: #159
54%
Expected Total Games: 22.9
Predicted Winner: Francesco Passaro

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Dino Prizmic

Form Index: 51.0
ELO Rating: 488.6
Glicko2 Rating: 1522.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 172.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 2.1
Clay: 4.1
Grass: 4.1
Serve Rating: 35.9
Return Rating: 50.8

Francesco Passaro

Form Index: 46.9
ELO Rating: 431.9
Glicko2 Rating: 1557.3
Current Fatigue (minutes): 206.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 5.0
Clay: 5.1
Grass: 3.5
Serve Rating: 96.4
Return Rating: 89.9

Recent Matches

Dino Prizmic

Francesco Passaro

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Dino Prizmic
vs
0
Francesco Passaro
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

This round-of-32 clay-court match in Rio, Brazil, at a 500-level event pits Dino Prizmic against Francesco Passaro. The model favors Francesco Passaro (54.35%) over Dino Prizmic (45.65%), with a projected total of about 22.85 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Prizmic (rank 122) enters with a stronger Elo (488.56) and a higher form index (50.97) than Passaro (rank 159, Elo 431.89, form 46.90). Prizmic’s surface strength index is 4.05 versus Passaro’s 5.08; both are modest on clay. Fatigue is notable: Prizmic has 172 minutes on court so far in the tournament, while Passaro has 206 minutes, which could influence later-game consistency. There is a large gap in serving and returning profiles: Passaro’s mean serve index (96.38) far exceeds Prizmic’s (35.93), and Passaro’s mean return index (89.92) similarly outstrips Prizmic’s (50.77), differences that are likely to shape service games and break opportunities. Recent form shows Prizmic winning two straight in Rio (straight-set victories over Tomas Barrios Vera and Daniel Galan) after a five-set loss at the Australian Open. Passaro is more up-and-down: a recent loss in Rio to Vilius Gaubas, a prior win over Elmer Moller in Rio, and a three-set loss in Buenos Aires. Prizmic’s two clean wins on site suggest comfort on these courts; Passaro’s volatile results and higher minutes indicate both capability and potential wear.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 22.9 Most likely outcome: 22 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Dino Prizmic - Francesco Passaro) -0.4 Most likely spread: -1 (Francesco Passaro wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. Positive values indicate Dino Prizmic winning more games, negative values indicate Francesco Passaro winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

Aces prediction for the match is about 22.19 total; predicted aces skew toward Passaro given his much higher serve index, which should increase his share of that total despite clay’s dampening effect. Double faults prediction sits at 5.61 expected double faults for the match; the slower surface and accumulated fatigue make double faults more likely as rallies extend and concentration wanes.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 22.2 Most likely: 22 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.6 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Dino Prizmic versus Francesco Passaro. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Passaro’s edge comes from superior serve and return metrics that outweigh slightly lower Elo and higher fatigue in the model. The key factor to watch is whether Passaro’s serving firepower translates on slow clay and whether fatigue affects his service consistency.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel