Montpellier France Hard Atp 250 Quarterfinals

Adrian Mannarino vs Arthur Gea: AI Prediction | Games, Aces & Double Faults

Adrian Mannarino

Rank: #69
51%
VS

Arthur Gea

Rank: #198
49%
Expected Total Games: 23.6
Predicted Winner: Adrian Mannarino

Player Metrics

Adrian Mannarino

Form Index: 31.7
ELO Rating: 816.3
Glicko2 Rating: 1575.5
Current Fatigue (minutes): 263.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 7.0
Clay: 4.7
Grass: 6.5
Serve Rating: 73.4
Return Rating: 68.6

Arthur Gea

Form Index: 70.6
ELO Rating: 599.9
Glicko2 Rating: 1541.5
Current Fatigue (minutes): 114.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 5.4
Clay: 2.5
Grass: 2.0
Serve Rating: 95.1
Return Rating: 91.8

Recent Matches

Adrian Mannarino

  • Last Match: vs Ugo Humbert (2-1) hard Montpellier 167 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Pedro Martinez (2-0) hard Montpellier 96 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Rinky Hijikata (0-3) hard Australian Open 174 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Eliot Spizzirri (0-2) hard Auckland 80 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Marin Cilic (0-2) hard Hong Kong 84 min

Arthur Gea

  • Last Match: vs Tomas Machac (1-1) hard Montpellier 75 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard (1-0) hard Montpellier 39 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Adolfo Daniel Vallejo (2-0) hard Australian Open 174 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Stan Wawrinka (2-3) hard Australian Open 174 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Jiri Lehecka (3-0) hard Australian Open 174 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Adrian Mannarino
vs
0
Arthur Gea
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

This quarterfinal in Montpellier (France) is played on indoor hard courts at an ATP 250-level event. The model slightly favors Adrian Mannarino to win — predicted probability 50.50% for Mannarino and 49.50% for Arthur Gea — with an expected total of about 23.55 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Adrian Mannarino arrives with the higher ranking (69 vs 198) and a substantially higher Elo rating (816.32 vs 599.86), suggesting more accumulated match-level strength. His form index is modest (31.72) and he carries significant fatigue from this event (263 minutes on court). Mannarino’s surface strength index is 6.97 and his serve/return indices (serve 73.38, return 68.59) point to a well-rounded baseline and return game on hard courts. Arthur Gea brings a contrasting profile: a strong recent form index (70.56) and much lower fatigue (114 minutes), but a lower Elo. He posts very high proprietary serve and return indices (serve 95.08, return 91.80) — both differences exceed 5 points versus Mannarino and are therefore notable. Gea’s surface strength index is slightly lower (5.44). Over the last three matches Mannarino won two matches at Montpellier (including a long 167-minute encounter with Ugo Humbert) and lost a straight-sets contest earlier at the Australian Open. Gea is 3-0 in the recent sample, with quicker victories in Montpellier and a straight-sets win at the Australian Open level indicated in the data.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 23.6 Most likely outcome: 23 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this match is elevated, with predicted aces around 10.57 for the match; expected double faults are about 4.47. On a medium-paced hard court, this level of aces is consistent with a balance between big serving and return opportunities. Given Gea’s significantly higher mean serve index, he is likely to contribute a larger share of the predicted aces, which will influence the overall ace count and return patterns. The double faults prediction remains moderate, reflecting both players’ serve profiles and the surface characteristics.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 10.6 Most likely: 10 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.5 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Final Prediction

Mannarino’s edge in ranking and Elo, combined with experience in longer matches, gives him a narrow projected advantage despite higher fatigue and Gea’s impressive serving metrics. The key factor to watch is Gea’s serve — if he converts that high serve index into free points, the match could swing away from the seed.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel