Wimbledon Great Britain Grass Grand Slam Round of 64

Jenson Brooksby vs Ignacio Buse: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Jenson Brooksby

Rank: #81
62%
VS

Ignacio Buse

Rank: #34
38%
Expected Total Games: 37.0
Predicted Winner: Jenson Brooksby

Why the Model Favors Jenson Brooksby

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Serve & return game +6.0 Jenson Brooksby
Surface fit +5.8 Jenson Brooksby
Recent record by level +5.5 Jenson Brooksby
Overall strength +3.0 Ignacio Buse
Age +2.7 Ignacio Buse

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 62% for Jenson Brooksby. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Jenson Brooksby

Form Index: 35.4
ELO Rating: 1532.7
Glicko2 Rating: 1532.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 17.7
Clay: 14.9
Grass: 19.0
Serve Rating: 95.9
Return Rating: 94.5

Ignacio Buse

Form Index: 57.8
ELO Rating: 1728.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1761.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 19.2
Clay: 26.0
Grass: 10.9
Serve Rating: 95.5
Return Rating: 88.6

Recent Matches

Jenson Brooksby

Ignacio Buse

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Jenson Brooksby
vs
0
Ignacio Buse
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At Wimbledon in London, Round of 64 on grass, the model gives Jenson Brooksby the edge over Ignacio Buse. Brooksby is predicted to win with a 61.75% probability to Buse’s 38.25%, and the match is expected to produce about 36.98 games.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Brooksby comes mainly from his serve & return profile and his better fit to grass; recent form at this level also nudges the projection toward him. Brooksby’s mean return index (94.46) is meaningfully higher than Buse’s (88.55), which underpins the “serve & return game” advantage noted by the model. Both players have similar mean serve indices (95.93 vs 95.54), so the return gap is the more relevant differential on quick grass. On surface fit Brooksby again has the advantage: his surface strength index is 18.96 versus Buse’s 10.92, a clear gap in the model’s grass-specific metric. Looking at background numbers, Buse is the higher-ranked and higher-rated player on paper (rank 34, Elo 1728.5) compared with Brooksby (rank 81, Elo 1532.7). Buse’s form index is also stronger (57.77 to Brooksby’s 35.45), which is why the model still gives some weight to overall strength in his favor. Fatigue is equal in the dataset (174 minutes each). Over their last three matches on grass, Brooksby beat Aleksandar Vukic twice and lost to Ugo Humbert in Eastbourne, while Buse’s recent run includes a big win over Emilio Nava and a prior victory over Stefanos Tsitsipas, with a loss to Vit Kopriva mixed in.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 37.0 Most likely outcome: 36 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Jenson Brooksby - Ignacio Buse) +0.5 Most likely spread: 0 (even number of games won)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. Positive values indicate Jenson Brooksby winning more games, negative values indicate Ignacio Buse winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction is moderately high: the model’s predicted aces for the match are 15.04, and the expected double faults are 6.78. Grass typically boosts ace counts because serves stay low and skid; this explains the relatively high predicted aces. Neither player has a significantly higher serve rating, so predicted aces are driven more by surface and overall serving quality than a single dominant server. The double faults prediction reflects a modest risk on the first-serve-heavy grass game.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 15.0 Most likely: 15 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 6.8 Most likely: 6 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Jenson Brooksby versus Ignacio Buse. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

38.1% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Jenson Brooksby's perspective)

3-0 Most likely set score (21.2%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Jenson Brooksby's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Brooksby’s edge is driven chiefly by his superior serve-and-return balance and better grass fit, which the model marks as the top factor. Watch the return dynamics early: if Brooksby can convert that return advantage into early breaks, the projection toward him will look prescient.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel