NBA 2025-2026: Minnesota Timberwolves vs New Orleans Pelicans: Winner probability, Total Points & Spread

Minnesota Timberwolves

Home Team
66.1%
VS

New Orleans Pelicans

Away Team
33.9%
2025-2026 Season

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Projections

AI-powered statistical projections for tonight's starters. Click a player to view their full probability distributions.

HOME Minnesota Timberwolves
PTS 13.5 REB 3.5 AST 4.1 3PM 3.2
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 7.2 REB 3.0 AST 2.5 3PM 1.1
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 9.6 REB 2.8 AST 2.2 3PM 1.8
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 6.1 REB 2.5 AST 1.5 3PM 1.0
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 8.4 REB 4.9 AST 1.1 3PM 0.0
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
AWAY New Orleans Pelicans
PTS 19.7 REB 4.2 AST 4.7 3PM 1.9
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 17.4 REB 3.1 AST 3.6 3PM 2.9
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 8.5 REB 3.7 AST 2.0 3PM 1.2
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 14.6 REB 7.9 AST 4.2 3PM 0.4
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)
PTS 5.9 REB 8.0 AST 2.2 3PM 0.7
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Points > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Rebounds > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(Assists > X)
Distribution (PDF)
Cumulative Probability — P(3-Pointers Made > X)

Starting Five Matchup

PG
Donte DiVincenzo
OR
114.7
DR
114.6
PTS
12.3
VS
Jeremiah Fears
OR
101.7
DR
119.4
PTS
14.0
SG
Jaylen Clark
OR
113.7
DR
115.8
PTS
4.0
VS
Jordan Poole
OR
98.9
DR
122.5
PTS
13.4
SF
Terrence Shannon Jr.
OR
86.2
DR
118.5
PTS
5.1
VS
Micah Peavy
OR
82.4
DR
120.8
PTS
4.0
PF
Julian Phillips
OR
89.2
DR
124.8
PTS
2.1
VS
Derik Queen
OR
105.2
DR
114.8
PTS
11.5
C
Joan Beringer
OR
137.1
DR
113.0
PTS
3.4
VS
Kevon Looney
OR
121.3
DR
119.0
PTS
2.8
OR = Offensive Rating · DR = Defensive Rating (lower is better) · PTS = Avg Points Per Game

Key Prediction Insights

Minnesota Timberwolves are projected to win (66.1% probability). Expected starting five — Minnesota Timberwolves: Donte DiVincenzo, Jaylen Clark, Terrence Shannon Jr., Julian Phillips, Joan Beringer. New Orleans Pelicans: Jeremiah Fears, Jordan Poole, Micah Peavy, Derik Queen, Kevon Looney.

Total Points and Spread Analysis

The model pegs the game at a combined 235.79 points, signaling a fast, high-scoring contest likely driven by uptempo possessions and offensive bursts. The expected spread (Home - Away) is 2.16, giving the home side roughly a two-point edge in what should be a close game.

🏀 Total Points Predictions

🏀
Expected Total Points in Game 235.8 Most likely outcome: 235 points
📊 Total Points Probability Distribution
Distribution

Probability of each total points outcome

Probability distribution bar chart for total combined points in the Minnesota Timberwolves versus New Orleans Pelicans NBA game. The X-axis shows possible total points values, and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total points ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function (CDF) chart for total points in Minnesota Timberwolves versus New Orleans Pelicans. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability that the game total will be at or below each points threshold.

📈 Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Spread (Minnesota Timberwolves - New Orleans Pelicans) 2.2 Most likely outcome: 2 points
📊 Spread Probability Distribution
Distribution

Probability of each spread outcome

Probability distribution bar chart for the point spread (home minus away) in the Minnesota Timberwolves versus New Orleans Pelicans NBA game. Positive values indicate a home team lead, negative values an away team lead.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function (CDF) chart for the point spread in Minnesota Timberwolves versus New Orleans Pelicans. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

ELO Rating Trends

ELO rating progression chart for Minnesota Timberwolves (orange) and New Orleans Pelicans (blue) over their most recent games. The Y-axis shows each team's ELO rating and the X-axis shows game dates. Higher values indicate stronger performance.

Minnesota’s power rating is largely stable over five games (small net change), while New Orleans is on a falling trend.

Minnesota Timberwolves

1553.3 -4.3 over 5 games
Date Opponent ELO Change
2026-04-10 Houston Rockets 1553.3 +12.2
2026-04-08 Orlando Magic 1541.1 -11.0
2026-04-07 Indiana Pacers 1552.1 +4.9
2026-04-05 Charlotte Hornets 1547.2 -10.4
2026-04-03 Philadelphia 76ers 1557.6

New Orleans Pelicans

1403.3 -16.1 over 5 games
Date Opponent ELO Change
2026-04-10 Boston Celtics 1403.3 -4.1
2026-04-07 Utah Jazz 1407.4 +7.4
2026-04-05 Orlando Magic 1400.0 -7.8
2026-04-03 Sacramento Kings 1407.8 -11.6
2026-04-02 Portland Trail Blazers 1419.4

NBA ELO Power Rankings

Curious how these teams stack up league-wide? Check the full ELO standings, progression charts, and conference breakdowns.

View Full ELO Standings

Recent Form — Last 5 Games

Minnesota Timberwolves

2-3 in last 5
W L W L L
Opponent PF PA Diff
Houston Rockets 136 132 +4
Orlando Magic 120 132 -12
Indiana Pacers 124 104 +20
Charlotte Hornets 108 122 -14
Philadelphia 76ers 103 115 -12

New Orleans Pelicans

1-4 in last 5
L W L L L
Opponent PF PA Diff
Boston Celtics 118 144 -26
Utah Jazz 156 137 +19
Orlando Magic 108 112 -4
Sacramento Kings 113 117 -4
Portland Trail Blazers 106 118 -12

Game Analysis

Minnesota enters 2-1 over the last three: a 136-132 win over Houston, a 120-132 loss to Orlando, and a 124-104 win at Indiana — showing scoring punch but some defensive lapses. New Orleans is 1-2: a heavy 118-144 loss to Boston, a 156-137 win over Utah, and a tight 108-112 loss to Orlando, reflecting volatility on both ends. The Pelicans can explode offensively but can also surrender a lot of points. Looking at the expected starters, Minnesota’s group averages an offensive rating of 108.18 and a defensive rating of 117.34, with a combined 26.9 average points made (5.38 per starter). New Orleans’ starters average an offensive rating of 101.90 and a defensive rating of 119.30, but combine for 45.7 average points made (9.14 per starter). That suggests Minnesota has a modest two-way edge in efficiency, while New Orleans relies more on starter scoring output.

Final Prediction

Minnesota’s steadier efficiency and slightly stronger two-way numbers give them the edge in a high-scoring affair. Watch how Minnesota defends the Pelicans’ starters — limiting Fears and Poole will be the key factor.

Get Daily NBA Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven NBA predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel