Rotterdam Netherlands Hard Atp 500 Quarterfinals

Tallon Griekspoor vs Felix Auger-Aliassime: AI Prediction | Games, Aces & Double Faults

Tallon Griekspoor

Rank: #29
34%
VS

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Rank: #8
66%
Expected Total Games: 24.9
Predicted Winner: Felix Auger-Aliassime

Player Metrics

Tallon Griekspoor

Form Index: 51.6
ELO Rating: 1321.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1628.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 193.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 7.6
Clay: 11.4
Grass: 12.6
Serve Rating: 90.1
Return Rating: 45.6

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Form Index: 70.3
ELO Rating: 4062.0
Glicko2 Rating: 1683.7
Current Fatigue (minutes): 182.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 28.8
Clay: 31.9
Grass: 32.8
Serve Rating: 98.5
Return Rating: 87.6

Recent Matches

Tallon Griekspoor

  • Last Match: vs Quentin Halys (2-0) hard Rotterdam 121 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard (2-0) hard Rotterdam 72 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Titouan Droguet (0-2) hard Montpellier 106 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Pablo Carreno Busta (2-0) hard Montpellier 66 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Ethan Quinn (0-3) hard Australian Open 174 min

Felix Auger-Aliassime

  • Last Match: vs Hamad Medjedovic (2-0) hard Rotterdam 90 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Alexei Popyrin (2-0) hard Rotterdam 92 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Adrian Mannarino (2-0) hard Montpellier 95 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Titouan Droguet (2-1) hard Montpellier 147 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Arthur Fils (2-0) hard Montpellier 68 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

1
Tallon Griekspoor
vs
0
Felix Auger-Aliassime
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
1 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Quarterfinal action in Rotterdam on indoor hard courts sets up Tallon Griekspoor vs Felix Auger-Aliassime in an ATP 500 event. The model favors Felix Auger-Aliassime to advance (65.58%) over Tallon Griekspoor (34.42%), with an expected total of about 24.9 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Auger-Aliassime arrives as the higher-ranked player (No. 8) with a stronger form index (70.35) and a markedly higher Elo (4062.00) compared with Griekspoor (rank 29, form 51.60, Elo 1321.25). Fatigue levels are comparable from this tournament — Griekspoor 193 minutes vs Auger-Aliassime 182 minutes — so recent court time is unlikely to be a decisive disparity. On hard courts, Auger-Aliassime also shows a clear edge in surface strength (28.84 vs Griekspoor’s 7.56). Serving and returning profiles accentuate the gap: Auger-Aliassime’s mean serve index (98.46) is about 8.4 points higher than Griekspoor’s (90.10), and his mean return index (87.57) dwarfs Griekspoor’s (45.58) — both differences exceed 5 points and will matter on this medium-paced hard surface. Griekspoor’s serve remains a strength, but Auger-Aliassime’s combination of elite serving and top-tier returning suggests he can pressure Griekspoor’s service games while holding his own. Form-wise, Griekspoor has two wins and one loss in his last three matches, including straight-set wins in Rotterdam against Halys and Mpetshi Perricard. Auger-Aliassime is on a three-match winning streak, all straight sets in the last two tournaments, offering a cleaner recent run into the quarterfinal.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.9 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction is modest for a hard-court contest: predicted aces for the match are about 10.6, with expected double faults around 4.47. Hard courts produce a balanced number of aces compared with grass or clay; because Auger-Aliassime has a significantly higher serve rating, he is likely to contribute a larger share of the predicted aces.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 10.6 Most likely: 10 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.5 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Final Prediction

Auger-Aliassime’s superior form, Elo and return capability give him the edge in this matchup. A key factor to watch is Auger-Aliassime’s ability to convert return pressure into early breaks—if he succeeds, the match should stay on the shorter side of the games projection.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel