Eastbourne Great Britain Grass Atp 250 Round of 16

Jack Draper vs Jack Pinnington Jones: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Jack Draper

Rank: #113
87%
VS

Jack Pinnington Jones

Rank: #147
13%
Expected Total Games: 26.9
Predicted Winner: Jack Draper

Why the Model Favors Jack Draper

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Recent record by level +13.7 Jack Draper
Surface fit +11.6 Jack Draper
Serve & return game +8.1 Jack Draper
Overall strength +7.8 Jack Draper
Age +1.6 Jack Pinnington Jones

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 87% for Jack Draper. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Jack Draper

Form Index: 33.3
ELO Rating: 1784.4
Glicko2 Rating: 1803.9
Current Fatigue (minutes): 85.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 48.7
Clay: 37.8
Grass: 27.1
Serve Rating: 98.2
Return Rating: 95.6

Jack Pinnington Jones

Form Index: 22.8
ELO Rating: 1475.3
Glicko2 Rating: 1546.0
Current Fatigue (minutes): 169.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 11.9
Clay: 7.7
Grass: 8.0
Serve Rating: 90.0
Return Rating: 81.5

Recent Matches

Jack Draper

Jack Pinnington Jones

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Jack Draper
vs
0
Jack Pinnington Jones
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At Eastbourne, Round of 16 on grass in a 250-level event in Great Britain, Jack Draper is strongly favored to progress. The model projects Draper to win with an 86.54% probability against Jack Pinnington Jones (13.46%), and forecasts about 26.87 total games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Draper comes mainly from his recent results by level and his better fit to grass; those two factors together account for most of the gap. Draper’s recent straight-set win at Eastbourne over Marcos Giron is a timely indicator on grass, while Pinnington Jones has survived a marathon 169-minute win here but otherwise has more losses in similar-level matches. Draper’s surface strength index (27.12) is higher than Pinnington Jones’s (8.04), supporting the model’s surface-fit lift. Serve and return differentials further widen the gap. Draper posts a mean serve index of 98.19 versus 89.96 for Pinnington Jones — a meaningful 8+-point advantage — and his mean return index (95.56) is about 14 points clearer than Pinnington Jones’s 81.51, both pushing the prediction toward Draper. Elo (1784 vs 1475) and form index (33.3 vs 22.8) also favor Draper, while accumulated fatigue is a concern for Pinnington Jones (169 minutes on court this week vs Draper’s 85), which likely reduces his ceiling. Over their last three matches, Draper is 1–2 with a recent grass win, while Pinnington Jones is 1–2 as well but with two lengthy matches that have increased his fatigue.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 26.9 Most likely outcome: 27 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Jack Draper - Jack Pinnington Jones) +4.8 Most likely spread: +5 (Jack Draper wins 5 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. Positive values indicate Jack Draper winning more games, negative values indicate Jack Pinnington Jones winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

Aces prediction: the match is expected to feature roughly 14.47 aces in total, reflecting grass’s fast, low-bouncing nature that rewards big servers. The predicted aces skew toward Draper given his significantly higher serve rating, which should boost his outright ace count. Double faults prediction: the expected double faults are 6.82 for the match; grass can tempt riskier serving, so some extra free points and errors are plausible.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 14.5 Most likely: 14 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 6.8 Most likely: 6 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Jack Draper versus Jack Pinnington Jones. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

41.5% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Jack Draper's perspective)

2-0 Most likely set score (59.2%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Jack Draper's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Draper’s advantage is driven above all by recent results at this level and a clearer surface fit. Watch his serve/return interplay and Pinnington Jones’s fatigue — those two factors will most determine whether the forecasted one-sided result holds.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel