Bastad Sweden Clay Atp 250 Round of 32

Jesper de Jong vs Vilius Gaubas: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Jesper de Jong

Rank: #73
61%
VS

Vilius Gaubas

Rank: #129
39%
Expected Total Games: 22.8
Predicted Winner: Jesper de Jong

Why the Model Favors Jesper de Jong

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Recent form +5.6 Jesper de Jong
Surface fit +4.8 Jesper de Jong
Recent record by level +4.8 Jesper de Jong
Serve & return game +4.5 Vilius Gaubas
Age +2.1 Vilius Gaubas

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 61% for Jesper de Jong. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Jesper de Jong

Form Index: 45.0
ELO Rating: 1679.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1586.3
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 16.8
Clay: 25.1
Grass: 9.0
Serve Rating: 95.8
Return Rating: 92.9

Vilius Gaubas

Form Index: 47.0
ELO Rating: 1640.4
Glicko2 Rating: 1680.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 9.2
Clay: 16.8
Grass: 14.1
Serve Rating: 94.8
Return Rating: 87.7

Recent Matches

Jesper de Jong

Vilius Gaubas

  • Last Match: vs Kyrian Jacquet (0-3) grass Wimbledon 174 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Dusan Lajovic (3-2) grass Wimbledon 174 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Henry Searle (2-0) grass Wimbledon 174 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Michael Mmoh (2-1) grass Wimbledon 174 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Luca Van Assche (1-3) clay Roland Garros 174 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

1
Jesper de Jong
vs
0
Vilius Gaubas
Hard
1 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

In the Bastad round of 32 on clay, Jesper de Jong is favored to beat Vilius Gaubas in this 250-level event in Sweden. The projection gives de Jong a 60.59% chance of winning versus 39.41% for Gaubas, with an expected total of about 22.8 games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for de Jong comes mainly from recent form, surface fit and recent record at this level—all pushing the probability toward him. De Jong’s rank (73), higher Elo (1679.2) and a surface strength index of 25.12 suggest a better baseline comfort on clay than Gaubas, whose surface index sits at 16.76. Form indices are close (de Jong 44.97, Gaubas 46.96), but the model weighted de Jong’s recent results at comparable events and clay performance more heavily. Neither player shows tournament fatigue (0 minutes on court), so freshness should not be a factor. On serve and return metrics the edge slightly tilts to Gaubas in one model driver, but the raw numbers tell a different story: de Jong’s mean serve index (95.79) and Gaubas’s (94.81) are almost identical, while de Jong holds a clear advantage in mean return (92.90 vs 87.69)—a difference greater than five points that matters on clay. Recent matches reinforce this: de Jong has a big-court loss to Zverev at Roland Garros, a solid win over Rinky Hijikata, then a loss at Wimbledon; Gaubas arrived with two grass-court wins before a recent defeat. Both players show streaky form, but de Jong’s clay credentials and higher ranking tilt the balance.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 22.8 Most likely outcome: 22 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Jesper de Jong - Vilius Gaubas) +1.4 Most likely spread: +1 (Jesper de Jong wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. Positive values indicate Jesper de Jong winning more games, negative values indicate Vilius Gaubas winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

Aces prediction for this encounter is modest—predicted aces stand at about 6.78—consistent with clay’s tendency to suppress free points. The expected double faults are 4.8, reflecting how longer points and physical demands on clay can raise pressure serving errors. There’s no large serve-rating gap to suggest a major swing in these numbers.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 6.8 Most likely: 6 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.8 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Jesper de Jong versus Vilius Gaubas. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

37.7% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Jesper de Jong's perspective)

2-0 Most likely set score (39.9%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Jesper de Jong's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

De Jong’s projected advantage is driven chiefly by recent form and a better surface fit on clay. Watch his return game early: if he can consistently neutralize Gaubas’s serve, the match should tilt firmly in his favor.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel