Washington DC, U.S.A. Hard Atp 500 Round of 32

Brandon Nakashima vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Brandon Nakashima

Rank: #33
65%
VS

Tomas Martin Etcheverry

Rank: #31
35%
Expected Total Games: 25.8
Predicted Winner: Brandon Nakashima

Why the Model Favors Brandon Nakashima

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Recent record by level +5.2 Brandon Nakashima
Surface fit +4.9 Brandon Nakashima
Recent form +3.2 Brandon Nakashima
Age +1.7 Brandon Nakashima
Serve & return game +1.3 Brandon Nakashima

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 65% for Brandon Nakashima. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Brandon Nakashima

Form Index: 37.8
ELO Rating: 1666.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1752.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 24.9
Clay: 19.4
Grass: 21.2
Serve Rating: 97.7
Return Rating: 88.1

Tomas Martin Etcheverry

Form Index: 26.9
ELO Rating: 1608.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1739.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 25.8
Clay: 24.3
Grass: 4.6
Serve Rating: 96.2
Return Rating: 86.6

Recent Matches

Brandon Nakashima

Tomas Martin Etcheverry

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Brandon Nakashima
vs
0
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At the Washington 500-level hard-court event in DC, Brandon Nakashima and Tomas Martin Etcheverry meet in the round of 32. The model favors Nakashima, projecting a 64.96% chance of victory to Etcheverry’s 35.04%, with an expected total of about 25.84 games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Nakashima stems mainly from his recent record by level and how his game fits this hard-court setting. Nakashima carries a higher Elo (1666.18) and a stronger proprietary form index (37.77) than Etcheverry (Elo 1608.81, form 26.87), and those numbers underpin the 5.2 and 4.9 percentage-point advantages the model attributes to recent record by level and surface fit. Both players arrive with zero tournament fatigue, so freshness shouldn’t be a differentiator. Looking deeper, Nakashima posts a notably high mean serve index (97.73) and mean return index (88.14); Etcheverry’s serve and return indices are close but slightly lower (serve 96.21, return 86.63). The differences are small and not large enough to be flagged as significant, but the model still gives modest weight to serve & return quality (+1.3 points). Surface strength indices are similar (Nakashima 24.90, Etcheverry 25.81), reflecting that both have middling hard-court profiles; age and recent form also tilt toward Nakashima (+1.7 and +3.2 points respectively). Recent match patterns differ: Nakashima’s last three were on grass—two wins and one loss in long, physically demanding contests—while Etcheverry’s recent results came on clay at Kitzbuhel, with two straight wins followed by a loss to Bublik. Those sequences underscore Nakashima’s stronger form index on recent results at higher levels.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 25.8 Most likely outcome: 25 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Brandon Nakashima - Tomas Martin Etcheverry) +0.7 Most likely spread: 0 (even number of games won)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. Positive values indicate Brandon Nakashima winning more games, negative values indicate Tomas Martin Etcheverry winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The model’s aces prediction for the match is about 16.75 total aces, and the double faults prediction sits near 3.51 expected double faults. On a medium-paced hard court, this aligns with a moderate ace count and relatively few doubles compared with faster grass; neither player’s serve rating is significantly higher to force a markedly different ace outcome.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 16.8 Most likely: 16 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 3.5 Most likely: 3 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Brandon Nakashima versus Tomas Martin Etcheverry. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

47.3% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Brandon Nakashima's perspective)

2-0 Most likely set score (38.9%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Brandon Nakashima's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Nakashima’s advantage is driven primarily by recent record at higher-level events, supported by slightly better form and marginally stronger serving and returning metrics. Watch his ability to convert short points on serve early—if he does, the projected edge should hold.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel