Barcelona Spain Clay Atp 500 Quarterfinals

Hamad Medjedovic vs Nuno Borges: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Hamad Medjedovic

Rank: #88
52%
VS

Nuno Borges

Rank: #52
48%
Expected Total Games: 24.1
Predicted Winner: Hamad Medjedovic

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Hamad Medjedovic

Form Index: 70.6
ELO Rating: 1685.1
Glicko2 Rating: 1748.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 442.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 53.9
Clay: 42.4
Grass: 39.8
Serve Rating: 83.0
Return Rating: 65.1

Nuno Borges

Form Index: 46.7
ELO Rating: 1623.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1657.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 203.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 54.8
Clay: 41.8
Grass: 43.0
Serve Rating: 97.8
Return Rating: 89.3

Recent Matches

Hamad Medjedovic

  • Last Match: vs Alex de Minaur (2-0) clay Barcelona 95 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Marco Trungelliti (2-0) clay Barcelona 90 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Quentin Halys (2-1) clay Barcelona 122 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Vilius Gaubas (2-0) clay Barcelona 135 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Vit Kopriva (1-2) clay Marrakech 145 min

Nuno Borges

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Hamad Medjedovic
vs
0
Nuno Borges
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Quarterfinals in Barcelona on clay — an ATP 500-level stage — sets up a compact, tactical clash between Hamad Medjedovic and Nuno Borges. The model narrowly favors Medjedovic (52.30%) over Borges (47.70%), with a predicted total of about 24.15 games, pointing toward a straight-sets affair with relatively few service breaks overall.

Match Analysis

Medjedovic arrives ranked 88 but with a higher Elo (1685) and a noticeably stronger recent form index (70.6) than Borges (46.7). His surface strength index (42.4) is almost identical to Borges’s (41.8), so neither player enjoys a pronounced clay advantage on paper. Fatigue is a real factor: Medjedovic has accumulated 442 minutes on court in the event compared with Borges’s 203, which could blunt some of his momentum late in rallies. Notably, Borges posts a much higher mean serve index (97.8) versus Medjedovic’s 83.0 — a gap large enough to affect service dominance. Conversely, Borges also boasts a superior mean return index (89.3) against Medjedovic’s 65.1, suggesting he’s more comfortable generating pressure on opponent serves. Looking at recent matches, Medjedovic has been consistent in Barcelona with three consecutive wins (including a straight-sets victory over Alex de Minaur) and solid match durations, showing resilience in longer encounters. Borges has also been effective here, winning his last two clay matches in Barcelona after a loss in Monte Carlo; his wins include a long 121-minute match versus Etcheverry, indicating comfort in extended baseline exchanges. Both players have shown the ability to close matches in two sets in this event.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.1 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Hamad Medjedovic - Nuno Borges) -1.4 Most likely spread: -2 (Nuno Borges wins 2 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. Positive values indicate Hamad Medjedovic winning more games, negative values indicate Nuno Borges winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction sits at about 10.91 for the match while the double faults prediction is 5.84. On clay, predicted aces are naturally suppressed by the slower surface and higher bounce; expected double faults can creep up as rallies and fatigue mount. Borges’s significantly higher serve rating should elevate the predicted aces somewhat, but the clay environment tempers that advantage.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 10.9 Most likely: 10 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.8 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Hamad Medjedovic versus Nuno Borges. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Medjedovic’s superior form and slightly higher Elo give him a slim edge, but his heavier minutes on court are a vulnerability. The key factor to watch is how Borges’s big serve and strong return pressure interact — if he can convert service opportunities early, he can flip the narrow projection in his favor.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel