Los Cabos Mexico Hard Atp 250 Round of 32

Jenson Brooksby vs Corentin Moutet: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Jenson Brooksby

Rank: #77
58%
VS

Corentin Moutet

Rank: #57
42%
Expected Total Games: 24.8
Predicted Winner: Jenson Brooksby

Why the Model Favors Jenson Brooksby

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Serve & return game +3.5 Jenson Brooksby
Recent form +3.2 Jenson Brooksby
Surface fit +1.3 Jenson Brooksby
Fatigue & recent workload +1.0 Corentin Moutet
Age +0.8 Jenson Brooksby

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 58% for Jenson Brooksby. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Jenson Brooksby

Form Index: 36.7
ELO Rating: 1592.0
Glicko2 Rating: 1558.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 17.7
Clay: 14.9
Grass: 21.2
Serve Rating: 95.8
Return Rating: 90.0

Corentin Moutet

Form Index: 26.6
ELO Rating: 1494.6
Glicko2 Rating: 1575.8
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 27.9
Clay: 16.2
Grass: 12.4
Serve Rating: 95.3
Return Rating: 88.5

Recent Matches

Jenson Brooksby

Corentin Moutet

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Jenson Brooksby
vs
1
Corentin Moutet
Hard
0 - 1
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Los Cabos, Mexico — Round of 32 on hard courts at a 250-level event sets up Jenson Brooksby vs Corentin Moutet. The model prefers Brooksby (57.53%) over Moutet (42.47%) and projects a relatively short encounter of about 24.82 total games.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Brooksby comes mainly from serve & return metrics and recent form. Brooksby posts a higher Elo (1592 vs 1495) and a stronger proprietary form index (36.72 vs 26.62), reflecting more consistent recent results. That statistical lead is supported by his high mean serve index (95.76) and top-tier mean return index (89.99), which together underpin the 3.5 percentage points credited to the serve & return game. Recent form itself adds roughly 3.2 points toward Brooksby: his last three recorded matches include two straight wins followed by a loss to Jannik Sinner at Wimbledon, whereas Moutet’s last three results show three straight defeats. Surface fit gives Brooksby a smaller edge (1.3 points); his surface strength index on hard is 17.65 versus Moutet’s 27.86, though both indices are modest on the proprietary 0–100 scale. Fatigue and recent workload slightly favor Moutet in the model (+1.0 point), yet both players show 0.0 cumulative minutes in this event; the model apparently factors other recent scheduling signals. Age also nudges the projection (+0.8 toward Brooksby) as a minor influence in the final probability. Both players have similar serving profiles—serve and return index gaps are well under 5 points—so expect rallies to be decided more by baseline control and return purpose than by sheer serving dominance. Brooksby’s stronger recent form and higher Elo are the clearest on-paper differentiators.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.8 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Jenson Brooksby - Corentin Moutet) +0.3 Most likely spread: 0 (even number of games won)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. Positive values indicate Jenson Brooksby winning more games, negative values indicate Corentin Moutet winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The model’s aces prediction sits at 7.68 total, while the expected double faults are 4.88. On a medium-paced hard court, this translates to a moderate ace count and a modest number of second-serve errors. Neither player has a significantly higher serve rating, so the predicted aces and the double faults prediction reflect balanced serving dynamics rather than one dominant big server.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 7.7 Most likely: 7 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.9 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Jenson Brooksby versus Corentin Moutet. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

31.9% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Jenson Brooksby's perspective)

2-0 Most likely set score (36.7%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Jenson Brooksby's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Brooksby’s projected advantage is driven chiefly by serve-and-return effectiveness and superior recent form. The key factor to watch will be Brooksby’s return aggression early in the match — it’s likely to set the tone and determine whether the contest stays on the shorter side of that ~25-game expectation.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel