Rome Italy Clay Masters 1000 Round of 32

Tommy Paul vs Luciano Darderi: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Tommy Paul

Rank: #18
64%
VS

Luciano Darderi

Rank: #20
36%
Expected Total Games: 27.1
Predicted Winner: Tommy Paul

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Tommy Paul

Form Index: 50.7
ELO Rating: 1839.0
Glicko2 Rating: 1883.0
Current Fatigue (minutes): 80.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 38.9
Clay: 39.8
Grass: 17.1
Serve Rating: 94.8
Return Rating: 91.5

Luciano Darderi

Form Index: 37.9
ELO Rating: 1685.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1755.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 90.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 19.9
Clay: 27.7
Grass: 15.6
Serve Rating: 94.5
Return Rating: 84.3

Recent Matches

Tommy Paul

Luciano Darderi

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Tommy Paul
vs
0
Luciano Darderi
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Rome, on its slow clay and at Masters 1000 level, produces a Round of 32 clash between Tommy Paul and Luciano Darderi. The model favors Tommy Paul to advance (64.24% win probability) over Darderi (35.76%), with a predicted total of about 27.09 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Paul arrives as the higher-ranked player (No. 18) with an Elo of 1839 and a stronger form index (50.74) than Darderi (rank 20, Elo 1685, form 37.86). Paul’s surface strength index (39.75) also sits well above Darderi’s (27.67), suggesting he adapts to clay better in the data provided. Both players have logged significant court time in Rome — Paul with 80 minutes and Darderi with 90 — so cumulative fatigue (Paul 80.0, Darderi 90.0) will be a factor, particularly in longer rallies and late-match serving. Serving profiles are remarkably similar: Paul’s mean serve index is 94.84 and Darderi’s 94.51, a negligible gap. On return, however, Paul holds a clear advantage (mean return index 91.48 versus Darderi’s 84.33), a difference greater than five points that could tilt baseline exchanges and break-point creation toward Paul. Over their last three matches Paul is 2-1: a straight-sets Rome win over Vukic, a loss to Tirante in Madrid, and a three-set win in Houston; Darderi is also 2-1, with a Rome win over Hanfmann, a Madrid loss to Francisco Cerundolo, and a victory over Juan Manuel Cerundolo. Both display streaks of resilience, but Paul’s higher form and return numbers make him steadier on clay in these data.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 27.1 Most likely outcome: 27 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Tommy Paul - Luciano Darderi) +1.5 Most likely spread: +1 (Tommy Paul wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. Positive values indicate Tommy Paul winning more games, negative values indicate Luciano Darderi winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction sits at 11.26 total for the match while the predicted double faults are 3.53. On slow clay, predicted aces are typically lower and the expected double faults can creep up as rallies and fatigue mount; that pattern is reflected here. With serve ratings almost identical, neither player is likely to dramatically inflate the predicted aces total.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 11.3 Most likely: 11 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 3.5 Most likely: 3 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Tommy Paul versus Luciano Darderi. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

41.0% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Tommy Paul's perspective)

2-0 Most likely set score (41.4%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Tommy Paul's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Paul’s edge comes from superior Elo, a higher form index and a markedly better return profile on clay, which underpins the 64% probability. Watch Paul’s ability to convert return chances early; if he breaks serve often he should control the tempo and shorten the encounter.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel