Madrid Spain Clay Masters 1000 Round of 64

Tallon Griekspoor vs Damir Dzumhur: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Tallon Griekspoor

Rank: #33
60%
VS

Damir Dzumhur

Rank: #84
40%
Expected Total Games: 23.2
Predicted Winner: Tallon Griekspoor

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Tallon Griekspoor

Form Index: 42.5
ELO Rating: 1656.4
Glicko2 Rating: 1706.8
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 59.9
Clay: 41.6
Grass: 44.0
Serve Rating: 90.3
Return Rating: 62.8

Damir Dzumhur

Form Index: 44.9
ELO Rating: 1550.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1520.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 77.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 51.5
Clay: 40.1
Grass: 39.6
Serve Rating: 97.5
Return Rating: 93.6

Recent Matches

Tallon Griekspoor

Damir Dzumhur

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Tallon Griekspoor
vs
0
Damir Dzumhur
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At the Madrid Masters 1000 on clay, Round of 64 pits Tallon Griekspoor against Damir Dzumhur in a match that looks finely balanced on paper but tilts toward Griekspoor. The model gives Tallon Griekspoor the edge (60.50%) over Damir Dzumhur (39.50%), with a predicted total of about 23.23 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Griekspoor comes in as the higher-ranked player (No. 33) with a stronger Elo (1656.4) than Dzumhur (rank 84, Elo 1550.45). His form index (42.54) and surface strength (41.59) are close to Dzumhur’s form (44.94) and surface strength (40.08), suggesting similar comfort on clay. Fatigue is a notable contrast: Griekspoor reports 0 minutes on court in this event, while Dzumhur has accumulated 77 minutes, which could matter on slow, attritional clay. There is a meaningful serve gap—Dzumhur’s mean serve index (97.50) exceeds Griekspoor’s (90.30) by over 7 points—while Dzumhur’s mean return index (93.64) also substantially outstrips Griekspoor’s (62.78), a difference of more than 30 points that could influence short-break opportunities. Recent form tells a mixed story. Griekspoor has dropped his last three clay matches (Marrakech, Monte Carlo, Munich), each going three sets and indicating form or confidence issues despite heavy court time in those events. Dzumhur is fresher in this draw, backing up his opening Madrid win over Mattia Bellucci but arriving off two earlier defeats in Munich and Monte Carlo. The combination of Griekspoor’s higher ranking and Dzumhur’s recent match minutes frames this as a battle between class and momentum.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 23.2 Most likely outcome: 23 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Tallon Griekspoor - Damir Dzumhur) -0.3 Most likely spread: -1 (Damir Dzumhur wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. Positive values indicate Tallon Griekspoor winning more games, negative values indicate Damir Dzumhur winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for the match is modest: the model expects about 10.79 total aces, and a double faults prediction of roughly 3.61 expected double faults. Clay’s slower, higher-bouncing surface typically reduces ace totals, so the predicted aces reflect surface suppression. Dzumhur’s superior serve index suggests he will contribute a larger share of the predicted aces, even as longer rallies on clay raise the chance of double faults late in rallies.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 10.8 Most likely: 10 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 3.6 Most likely: 3 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Tallon Griekspoor versus Damir Dzumhur. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Griekspoor’s edge is driven by higher ranking, superior Elo and the freshness factor on a physically demanding clay court; those elements outweigh Dzumhur’s stronger serve and return metrics. The key factor to watch will be whether Dzumhur’s serve can produce free points without accumulating errors, especially as the match goes long.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel