Rotterdam Netherlands Hard Atp 500 Quarterfinals

Tallon Griekspoor vs Felix Auger-Aliassime: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Tallon Griekspoor

Rank: #29
34%
VS

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Rank: #8
66%
Expected Total Games: 24.9
Predicted Winner: Felix Auger-Aliassime

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Tallon Griekspoor

Form Index: 51.6
ELO Rating: 1321.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1628.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 193.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 7.6
Clay: 11.4
Grass: 12.6
Serve Rating: 90.1
Return Rating: 45.6

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Form Index: 70.3
ELO Rating: 4062.0
Glicko2 Rating: 1683.7
Current Fatigue (minutes): 182.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 28.8
Clay: 31.9
Grass: 32.8
Serve Rating: 98.5
Return Rating: 87.6

Recent Matches

Tallon Griekspoor

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

1
Tallon Griekspoor
vs
0
Felix Auger-Aliassime
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
1 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Quarterfinal action in Rotterdam on indoor hard courts sets up Tallon Griekspoor vs Felix Auger-Aliassime in an ATP 500 event. The model favors Felix Auger-Aliassime to advance (65.58%) over Tallon Griekspoor (34.42%), with an expected total of about 24.9 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Auger-Aliassime arrives as the higher-ranked player (No. 8) with a stronger form index (70.35) and a markedly higher Elo (4062.00) compared with Griekspoor (rank 29, form 51.60, Elo 1321.25). Fatigue levels are comparable from this tournament — Griekspoor 193 minutes vs Auger-Aliassime 182 minutes — so recent court time is unlikely to be a decisive disparity. On hard courts, Auger-Aliassime also shows a clear edge in surface strength (28.84 vs Griekspoor’s 7.56). Serving and returning profiles accentuate the gap: Auger-Aliassime’s mean serve index (98.46) is about 8.4 points higher than Griekspoor’s (90.10), and his mean return index (87.57) dwarfs Griekspoor’s (45.58) — both differences exceed 5 points and will matter on this medium-paced hard surface. Griekspoor’s serve remains a strength, but Auger-Aliassime’s combination of elite serving and top-tier returning suggests he can pressure Griekspoor’s service games while holding his own. Form-wise, Griekspoor has two wins and one loss in his last three matches, including straight-set wins in Rotterdam against Halys and Mpetshi Perricard. Auger-Aliassime is on a three-match winning streak, all straight sets in the last two tournaments, offering a cleaner recent run into the quarterfinal.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.9 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Tallon Griekspoor - Felix Auger-Aliassime) -2.1 Most likely spread: -3 (Felix Auger-Aliassime wins 3 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. Positive values indicate Tallon Griekspoor winning more games, negative values indicate Felix Auger-Aliassime winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction is modest for a hard-court contest: predicted aces for the match are about 10.6, with expected double faults around 4.47. Hard courts produce a balanced number of aces compared with grass or clay; because Auger-Aliassime has a significantly higher serve rating, he is likely to contribute a larger share of the predicted aces.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 10.6 Most likely: 10 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.5 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Tallon Griekspoor versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Auger-Aliassime’s superior form, Elo and return capability give him the edge in this matchup. A key factor to watch is Auger-Aliassime’s ability to convert return pressure into early breaks—if he succeeds, the match should stay on the shorter side of the games projection.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel