Cincinnati Cincinnati, USA Hard Wta 1000 Quarterfinals

Emma Navarro vs Jessica Pegula: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Emma Navarro

Rank: #28
27%
VS

Jessica Pegula

Rank: #3
73%
Expected Total Games: 20.6
Predicted Winner: Jessica Pegula

Why the Model Favors Jessica Pegula

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Overall strength +10.2 Jessica Pegula
Serve & return game +7.2 Jessica Pegula
Surface fit +3.8 Jessica Pegula
Recent record by level +3.5 Jessica Pegula
Age +3.2 Emma Navarro

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 73% for Jessica Pegula. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network, not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude and Perplexity. Query these predictions in plain language: our native connector lets your AI assistant call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Emma Navarro

Form Index: 36.8
ELO Rating: 1749.3
Glicko2 Rating: 1785.8
Current Fatigue (minutes): 136.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 24.1
Clay: 31.0
Grass: 39.3
Serve Rating: 95.8
Return Rating: 93.2

Jessica Pegula

Form Index: 46.7
ELO Rating: 1984.9
Glicko2 Rating: 2108.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 91.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 73.7
Clay: 38.8
Grass: 59.1
Serve Rating: 96.9
Return Rating: 88.3

Recent Matches

Emma Navarro

Jessica Pegula

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Emma Navarro
vs
2
Jessica Pegula
Hard
0 - 1
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 1

Key Prediction Insights

This Cincinnati quarterfinal on hard courts is a high stakes WTA 1000 match in Ohio. The model favors Jessica Pegula to win, with a 73.48% probability versus a 26.52% chance for Emma Navarro, and it projects about 20.6 total games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Pegula comes mainly from overall strength, with additional weight from serve and return performance and better surface fit. Pegula’s superiority is visible in the numbers. She is ranked 3 versus Navarro at 28. Her Elo is 1984.9 compared with Navarro’s 1749.3. Pegula’s form index sits at 46.7, higher than Navarro’s 36.8. Those factors together move the prediction toward Pegula, reflecting the 10.2 and 7.2 percentage point contributions flagged by the model. Surface and workload also matter here. Pegula’s surface strength index on hard courts is 73.7, far above Navarro’s 24.1, which helps explain the surface fit advantage. Navarro has logged more minutes on court at this event, 136 minutes versus Pegula’s 91 minutes, so fatigue favors Pegula. Serve profiles are similar on paper, with mean serve indices of 96.9 for Pegula and 95.8 for Navarro, so neither player holds a massive edge in pure serve power. Navarro’s mean return index is 93.2, marginally higher than Pegula’s 88.3, but that gap is below a 5 point threshold so it is not treated as decisive. Over the last three matches Navarro is 1-2, with a recent Cincinnati win that lasted 136 minutes and two prior losses. Pegula is 2-1 in her last three matches, including a straight sets win here in Cincinnati and a shorter workload overall.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 20.6 Most likely outcome: 20 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Emma Navarro - Jessica Pegula) -3.8 Most likely spread: -4 (Jessica Pegula wins 4 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. Positive values indicate Emma Navarro winning more games, negative values indicate Jessica Pegula winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this match is modest, with predicted aces at about 4.82. This aligns with hard courts producing a medium ace count compared with grass or clay. The double faults prediction is higher than aces, with expected double faults around 8.37 for the match. Neither player has a significantly higher serve rating that would push the predicted aces drastically up, so the expected totals reflect balanced serving on a medium paced hard court.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 4.8 Most likely: 4 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 8.4 Most likely: 8 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. The chart shows the predicted probability for each double-fault count.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Emma Navarro versus Jessica Pegula. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

18.4% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Emma Navarro's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (57.0%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Emma Navarro's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Pegula’s clear overall strength is the top reason she is favored, supported by better hard court fit and a lower tournament workload. Watch the early service games and baseline control as the key factors that will determine whether Navarro’s quality returning can disrupt Pegula’s rhythm.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel