Wimbledon Great Britain Grass Grand Slam Round of 64

Brandon Nakashima vs Jan-Lennard Struff: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Brandon Nakashima

Rank: #31
85%
VS

Jan-Lennard Struff

Rank: #74
15%
Expected Total Games: 40.6
Predicted Winner: Brandon Nakashima

Why the Model Favors Brandon Nakashima

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Recent record by level +13.8 Brandon Nakashima
Overall strength +5.7 Brandon Nakashima
Age +5.2 Brandon Nakashima
Serve & return game +4.9 Brandon Nakashima
Surface fit +4.3 Brandon Nakashima

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 85% for Brandon Nakashima. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Brandon Nakashima

Form Index: 60.9
ELO Rating: 1718.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1770.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 24.9
Clay: 19.4
Grass: 25.1
Serve Rating: 97.7
Return Rating: 92.6

Jan-Lennard Struff

Form Index: 47.7
ELO Rating: 1605.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1604.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 15.8
Clay: 16.7
Grass: 21.4
Serve Rating: 95.8
Return Rating: 84.8

Recent Matches

Brandon Nakashima

Jan-Lennard Struff

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Brandon Nakashima
vs
0
Jan-Lennard Struff
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At Wimbledon in London, Round of 64 on grass, Brandon Nakashima is projected to prevail over Jan-Lennard Struff in this Grand Slam encounter. The model gives Nakashima an 85.04% chance to win against 14.96% for Struff, with an expected total of about 40.6 games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Nakashima comes mainly from his recent results at this level and his superior overall profile. Recent record by level contributed the largest boost (+13.8 points): Nakashima arrives with two strong wins in grass events (including a straight-sets victory at Wimbledon and a win over Alex de Minaur) versus one three-set loss, while Struff’s recent wins include a five-set Wimbledon match and an earlier loss in Mallorca. Overall strength (rank, Elo and form) also favors Nakashima (+5.7): he is ranked 31 with an Elo of 1718.8 and a form index of 61.1, compared with Struff at rank 74, Elo 1606.5 and form 47.9. Both players show equal cumulative fatigue from this tournament (174 minutes on court), so recovery should not be a differentiator. Serve and return dynamics push further toward Nakashima (+4.9): both men carry strong serve indexes (Nakashima 97.75, Struff 95.77 — difference under 5 points), but Nakashima’s mean return index (92.59) is materially higher than Struff’s (84.79), a gap that matters on grass when breaks are rarer. Surface fit nudges Nakashima (+4.3) as well — his surface strength index is 25.09 versus Struff’s 21.39 — suggesting a slightly better adaptation to the low, fast bounces. Over their last three matches, Nakashima’s slate reads two wins and one defeat with substantive victories; Struff’s set of results includes a hard-fought five-set win, a straight-sets loss and a prior win.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 40.6 Most likely outcome: 40 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Brandon Nakashima - Jan-Lennard Struff) +3.9 Most likely spread: +3 (Brandon Nakashima wins 3 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. Positive values indicate Brandon Nakashima winning more games, negative values indicate Jan-Lennard Struff winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction is for a high count: the model’s predicted aces total is 24.89 for the match, reflecting grass as the fastest surface which favors free points from service. The double faults prediction sits at an expected double faults total of 7.69. Since neither player shows a significantly higher serve rating (difference <5 points), the predicted aces likely reflect both players’ strong serving rather than one dominant server.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 24.9 Most likely: 24 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 7.7 Most likely: 7 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Brandon Nakashima versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

54.7% Predicted: Tiebreak likely

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Brandon Nakashima's perspective)

3-0 Most likely set score (43.8%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Brandon Nakashima's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Nakashima’s advantage is driven primarily by recent results at this level and superior overall metrics, with his return game a decisive supporting factor. Watch the return/return-to-break conversion early: if Nakashima can pressure Struff’s service games, the match is likely to settle quickly.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel