Roland Garros France Clay Grand Slam Round of 64

Casper Ruud vs Hamad Medjedovic: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Casper Ruud

Rank: #17
55%
VS

Hamad Medjedovic

Rank: #56
45%
Expected Total Games: 38.6
Predicted Winner: Casper Ruud

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Casper Ruud

Form Index: 60.2
ELO Rating: 1921.1
Glicko2 Rating: 1876.3
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 31.1
Clay: 45.2
Grass: 27.4
Serve Rating: 95.6
Return Rating: 88.9

Hamad Medjedovic

Form Index: 68.1
ELO Rating: 1755.1
Glicko2 Rating: 1789.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 20.6
Clay: 28.4
Grass: 7.4
Serve Rating: 95.8
Return Rating: 86.1

Recent Matches

Casper Ruud

Hamad Medjedovic

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

1
Casper Ruud
vs
0
Hamad Medjedovic
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
1 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At Roland Garros in Paris, the round of 64 on clay sets up a contrast in experience and trajectory as Casper Ruud meets Hamad Medjedovic in a Grand Slam early round. The model favours Casper Ruud to advance (55.30% win probability) with Medjedovic carrying a realistic 44.70% chance; the predicted total number of games is 38.57, pointing to a competitive encounter rather than a runaway scoreline.

Match Analysis

Ruud arrives as the higher-ranked player (No. 17) with an Elo of 1921 and a surface strength index of 45.22, indicating a clear comfort on clay relative to his opponent. His form index sits at 60.18 and his mean return index (88.85) is marginally better than Medjedovic’s; both players show very similar mean serve indices, so serve-firepower should not be a decisive differentiator. Medjedovic, ranked 56 with an Elo of 1755, brings a higher form index (68.08) and a lower surface strength index (28.39), suggesting he is in good recent nick but less naturally suited to the clay court characteristics. Both players share an identical tournament fatigue figure (174 minutes), after long last-round encounters, which levels the physical ledger heading into this match. Recent results show Ruud with two wins and one loss across his last three matches, while Medjedovic also posts two wins and one loss; Ruud’s wins include a five-set test at Roland Garros, whereas Medjedovic’s last outing was a four-set victory. Those recent patterns underline resilience on both sides without either player running away with momentum.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 38.6 Most likely outcome: 38 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Casper Ruud - Hamad Medjedovic) 0.0 Most likely spread: 0 (even number of games won)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. Positive values indicate Casper Ruud winning more games, negative values indicate Hamad Medjedovic winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for the match is modest: the model’s predicted aces total is 16.5. On clay, the expected reduction in free points means fewer outright service winners, so that predicted aces figure is consistent with the surface. The expected double faults tally is 5.94 — the double faults prediction reflects longer rallies and physical wear on clay, which can increase error-prone serves late in matches. With serve indices nearly identical, neither player should dominate the ace count purely on serve rating.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 16.5 Most likely: 16 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.9 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Casper Ruud versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

46.3% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Casper Ruud's perspective)

3-0 Most likely set score (29.7%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Casper Ruud's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Ruud’s higher ranking, superior Elo and clearer clay pedigree give him the edge in probability despite Medjedovic’s stronger recent form. The key factor to watch will be Ruud’s ability to convert return opportunities on a slower surface where extended baseline exchanges and break chances are likely to decide tight service holds.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel