Rome Italy Clay Masters 1000 Round of 128

Damir Dzumhur vs Adrian Mannarino: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Damir Dzumhur

Rank: #87
50%
VS

Adrian Mannarino

Rank: #45
50%
Expected Total Games: 24.2
Predicted Winner: Damir Dzumhur

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Damir Dzumhur

Form Index: 33.5
ELO Rating: 1532.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1513.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 14.6
Clay: 13.8
Grass: 6.8
Serve Rating: 95.7
Return Rating: 95.6

Adrian Mannarino

Form Index: 25.8
ELO Rating: 1483.3
Glicko2 Rating: 1541.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 21.1
Clay: 1.0
Grass: 22.3
Serve Rating: 95.0
Return Rating: 87.2

Recent Matches

Damir Dzumhur

Adrian Mannarino

  • Last Match: vs Ignacio Buse (0-2) clay Madrid 83 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Nuno Borges (0-2) clay Barcelona 82 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Zizou Bergs (0-2) clay Monte Carlo 81 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Daniel Merida (1-2) clay Bucharest 113 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Tommy Paul (1-2) hard Miami 127 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Damir Dzumhur
vs
0
Adrian Mannarino
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Rome, clay court, Masters 1000 round of 128 pits Damir Dzumhur against Adrian Mannarino in an evenly poised opener. The model gives Dzumhur the slightest edge — 50.30% to Mannarino’s 49.70% — with a predicted total of about 24.17 games in the match, suggesting a straight-sets affair is the most likely outcome.

Match Analysis

Dzumhur (rank 87) arrives with an Elo of 1532.78 and a form index of 33.53; Mannarino (rank 45) posts an Elo of 1483.31 with a form index of 25.82. Both players show zero accumulated fatigue in this event. On clay their surface strength indices differ markedly: Dzumhur’s 13.82 versus Mannarino’s 1.03, indicating Dzumhur is comparatively more comfortable on this surface according to the provided metric. Their mean serve indices are very close (Dzumhur 95.67, Mannarino 94.99), so there is no clear serving-power gap, but Dzumhur’s mean return index (95.57) is notably higher than Mannarino’s (87.15), a difference of over 8 points that favors Dzumhur when it comes to creating break chances and dictating baseline exchanges. Recent form underlines a modest advantage for Dzumhur: over his last three clay outings he has one win (Mattia Bellucci) and two losses, including a competitive showing in Madrid; his matches have ranged from 77 to 103 minutes. Mannarino’s last three clay matches show three straight losses (Ignacio Buse, Nuno Borges, Zizou Bergs) with match durations clustered around the low 80s. Those results and the return/ surface metrics help explain why the projection is so tight.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.2 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Damir Dzumhur - Adrian Mannarino) -2.5 Most likely spread: -3 (Adrian Mannarino wins 3 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. Positive values indicate Damir Dzumhur winning more games, negative values indicate Adrian Mannarino winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this match is low by faster-surface standards: predicted aces total 7.59. Expected double faults are 4.26, reflecting clay’s tendency to suppress aces while physical longer rallies can raise double faults. Since neither player holds a significantly higher serve rating, the predicted aces remain moderate; Dzumhur’s stronger return profile could also contribute to fewer free points for the server.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 7.6 Most likely: 7 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.3 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Damir Dzumhur versus Adrian Mannarino. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

25.7% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Damir Dzumhur's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (34.9%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Damir Dzumhur's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Dzumhur’s edge comes from a superior return metric and a higher clay comfort index, factors that matter on Rome’s slow, high-bounce courts. Watch the early service games and return aggression — the ability to convert early break opportunities should decide this very tight matchup.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel