Wimbledon Great Britain Grass Grand Slam Round of 64

Daniel Merida vs Daniil Medvedev: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Daniel Merida

Rank: #84
14%
VS

Daniil Medvedev

Rank: #9
86%
Expected Total Games: 37.6
Predicted Winner: Daniil Medvedev

Why the Model Favors Daniil Medvedev

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Recent record by level +11.4 Daniil Medvedev
Overall strength +7.9 Daniil Medvedev
Serve & return game +6.4 Daniil Medvedev
Recent form +5.4 Daniil Medvedev
Age +3.3 Daniel Merida

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 86% for Daniil Medvedev. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Daniel Merida

Form Index: 48.1
ELO Rating: 1664.6
Glicko2 Rating: 1739.8
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 17.4
Clay: 20.0
Grass: 9.5
Serve Rating: 95.5
Return Rating: 95.0

Daniil Medvedev

Form Index: 53.4
ELO Rating: 1861.9
Glicko2 Rating: 1924.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 174.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 52.2
Clay: 28.8
Grass: 26.3
Serve Rating: 96.3
Return Rating: 89.1

Recent Matches

Daniel Merida

Daniil Medvedev

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Daniel Merida
vs
0
Daniil Medvedev
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Wimbledon, Round of 64 in Great Britain on grass — a fast, low-bouncing surface that rewards big serving and quick ball-striking. The model projects Daniil Medvedev to advance (85.70% win probability) over Daniel Merida (14.30%), with a predicted total of about 37.6 games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Medvedev comes mainly from his recent results by level and overall strength: those two factors alone swing the projection substantially toward him. That is visible in the raw numbers — Medvedev is ranked 9 with an Elo around 1862, compared with Merida at 84 and an Elo near 1665. Medvedev also posts a slightly higher form index (53.42 vs 48.09) and his surface strength index on grass (26.30) is meaningfully above Merida’s (9.52), which helps explain the “recent record by level” and “overall strength” advantages. Serve and return dynamics also favor Medvedev in the model, despite an interesting split in the underlying indices: the players have very similar mean serve indexes (96.27 for Medvedev, 95.50 for Merida — well within 5 points), but Merida actually shows a higher mean return index (95.04 vs 89.14), a difference greater than 5 points. In practice that sets up a contest where Merida’s return quality could be a live factor, yet Medvedev’s higher ranking, Elo and better recent results on grass tilt the aggregated serve/return assessment toward him. Fatigue is identical in the data (174 minutes each). Over the last three matches Merida has one win (a long Wimbledon match) and two straight losses at other events; Medvedev arrives with two recent wins including a straight-sets Wimbledon victory and one loss at Halle.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 37.6 Most likely outcome: 37 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Daniel Merida - Daniil Medvedev) -6.0 Most likely spread: -6 (Daniil Medvedev wins 6 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. Positive values indicate Daniel Merida winning more games, negative values indicate Daniil Medvedev winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction and predicted aces total for this match sits at about 16.8; expected double faults are roughly 9.2. Grass typically increases ace counts because of the lower bounce and faster pace, so the relatively high aces prediction fits the surface. With serve ratings nearly identical, neither player is projected to dominate the ace count purely on serve index alone, though Medvedev’s slightly higher serving profile in match situations supports a strong serving display.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 16.8 Most likely: 16 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 9.2 Most likely: 9 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Daniel Merida versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

44.7% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Daniel Merida's perspective)

0-3 Most likely set score (53.4%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Daniel Merida's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Medvedev’s advantage is driven primarily by recent record by level and overall strength — the clearest model driver — reinforced by superior grass credentials and Elo. Watch the return battle: Merida’s higher mean return index is the most interesting subplot and could be decisive if he converts those chances.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel