Santiago Chile Clay Atp 250 Quarterfinals

Francisco Cerundolo vs Emilio Nava: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Francisco Cerundolo

Rank: #19
76%
VS

Emilio Nava

Rank: #79
24%
Expected Total Games: 22.2
Predicted Winner: Francisco Cerundolo

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Francisco Cerundolo

Form Index: 53.8
ELO Rating: 1948.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1683.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 70.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 13.3
Clay: 12.5
Grass: 15.3
Serve Rating: 77.0
Return Rating: 87.0

Emilio Nava

Form Index: 50.0
ELO Rating: 696.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1535.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 175.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 6.6
Clay: 5.9
Grass: 5.0
Serve Rating: 97.5
Return Rating: 86.3

Recent Matches

Francisco Cerundolo

Emilio Nava

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Francisco Cerundolo
vs
0
Emilio Nava
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Quarterfinals in Santiago, Chile on clay at an ATP 250 event sets the stage for Francisco Cerundolo vs Emilio Nava. The model favors Cerundolo to win (76.22% vs 23.78%), with a projected total of about 22.17 games in the match — suggesting a straight-sets affair with relatively few service breaks overall.

Match Analysis

Cerundolo enters as the higher-ranked player (No. 19) with a stronger Elo (1948.2) and a slightly better form index (53.77) than Nava (rank 79, Elo 696.8, form 49.98). Cerundolo’s surface strength index (12.46) is modestly better than Nava’s (5.91), and his mean return index (87.03) is almost identical to Nava’s (86.25), which means returning quality should be evenly matched. The mean serve indices diverge sharply: Nava’s serve index (97.51) is roughly 20 points higher than Cerundolo’s (77.01), a difference worth noting for hold dynamics on serve. Fatigue is a clear contrast: Cerundolo has 70 minutes on court in this event, while Nava carries 175 minutes, which could erode serve potency late. Over their last three matches, Cerundolo has two wins and a loss — solid performances on clay including a straight-sets win in his most recent Santiago match. Nava has also posted two wins (including a notable victory over Matteo Berrettini) and one loss; however his longer recent court time and the straight-sets wins both had matches lasting closer to 85–90 minutes, adding to cumulative fatigue.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 22.2 Most likely outcome: 22 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Francisco Cerundolo - Emilio Nava) +1.8 Most likely spread: +2 (Francisco Cerundolo wins 2 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. Positive values indicate Francisco Cerundolo winning more games, negative values indicate Emilio Nava winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this match is 15.91 total, while the expected double faults sit at 5.94. On clay, predicted aces tend to be lower because the slower surface and higher bounce reduce free points; this expected aces number reflects that. Given Nava’s significantly higher serve rating, he likely accounts for a disproportionate share of the predicted aces, but his accumulated minutes raise the chance of unforced serving errors and expected double faults rising later in matches.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 15.9 Most likely: 15 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.9 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Francisco Cerundolo versus Emilio Nava. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Cerundolo’s superior ranking, Elo, return quality and fresher legs give him the edge in Santiago’s quarterfinals. Watch how Nava’s big-serve advantage actually translates on slow clay and whether fatigue leads to more double faults — that will be the key factor deciding if this stays short or stretches longer.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel