Roland Garros France Clay Grand Slam Round of 128

Hamad Medjedovic vs Yannick Hanfmann: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Hamad Medjedovic

Rank: #56
68%
VS

Yannick Hanfmann

Rank: #55
32%
Expected Total Games: 39.1
Predicted Winner: Hamad Medjedovic

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Hamad Medjedovic

Form Index: 44.7
ELO Rating: 1722.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1773.8
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 20.6
Clay: 25.0
Grass: 7.4
Serve Rating: 96.7
Return Rating: 91.5

Yannick Hanfmann

Form Index: 39.2
ELO Rating: 1659.1
Glicko2 Rating: 1738.5
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 24.7
Clay: 23.3
Grass: 13.7
Serve Rating: 95.5
Return Rating: 86.2

Recent Matches

Hamad Medjedovic

Yannick Hanfmann

  • Last Match: vs Luciano Darderi (0-2) clay Hamburg 113 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Max Schoenhaus (2-1) clay Hamburg 135 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Luciano Darderi (0-2) clay Rome 90 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Hubert Hurkacz (2-1) clay Rome 139 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Francisco Cerundolo (0-2) clay Madrid 100 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Hamad Medjedovic
vs
0
Yannick Hanfmann
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Roland Garros, Paris — first round on clay at the 2026 Grand Slam sees No.56 Hamad Medjedovic facing No.55 Yannick Hanfmann. The model favours Medjedovic, projecting a 68.25% chance of victory to Hanfmann’s 31.75%, and estimates about 39.1 total games in the match.

Match Analysis

Medjedovic arrives with a higher Elo (1722.45) and a stronger form index (44.66) than Hanfmann (Elo 1659.13, form 39.22). Both players show minimal tournament fatigue (0 minutes), and their surface strength indices are similar and modest (Medjedovic 24.97, Hanfmann 23.28), suggesting neither is a clay specialist on paper. Their mean serve indices are very close (Medjedovic 96.65, Hanfmann 95.47), so serve advantage is negligible; however Medjedovic’s mean return index (91.46) is meaningfully higher than Hanfmann’s (86.24), a gap just over five points that points to stronger return pressure from Medjedovic. Over the last three matches Medjedovic posted two wins in Rome before a recent straight-sets loss to Martin Landaluce; his matches included long contests (144 and 182 minutes) indicative of stamina in extended clay battles. Hanfmann’s recent sequence is more mixed: a win in Hamburg sandwiched between two losses (one in Rome, one in Hamburg), with match lengths around the 90–135 minute range. Both men have experience in prolonged clay matches, but Medjedovic’s slightly stronger form and return metrics underpin the prediction.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 39.1 Most likely outcome: 39 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Hamad Medjedovic - Yannick Hanfmann) +1.9 Most likely spread: +1 (Hamad Medjedovic wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. Positive values indicate Hamad Medjedovic winning more games, negative values indicate Yannick Hanfmann winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this clay encounter is modest: the model’s predicted aces total is 17.14 for the match, while the double faults prediction sits at an expected double faults figure of 8.08. Clay’s slower, higher-bouncing surface typically suppresses ace counts and can increase pressure-induced errors late in long rallies; here the small serve-index gap means neither player should overpower the other’s serve to greatly inflate aces.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 17.1 Most likely: 17 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 8.1 Most likely: 8 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Hamad Medjedovic versus Yannick Hanfmann. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

46.5% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Hamad Medjedovic's perspective)

3-0 Most likely set score (32.0%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Hamad Medjedovic's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Medjedovic’s edge comes from superior Elo, recent form and a significantly better return index, which should allow him to generate break opportunities on clay. Key factor to watch: Medjedovic’s ability to convert return pressure into breaks early, which would force Hanfmann out of a holding rhythm.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel