Hamburg Germany Clay Atp 500 Quarterfinals

Ignacio Buse vs Ugo Humbert: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Ignacio Buse

Rank: #62
41%
VS

Ugo Humbert

Rank: #33
59%
Expected Total Games: 27.9
Predicted Winner: Ugo Humbert

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Ignacio Buse

Form Index: 56.2
ELO Rating: 1672.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1715.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 293.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 19.2
Clay: 20.5
Grass: 6.6
Serve Rating: 95.7
Return Rating: 93.8

Ugo Humbert

Form Index: 50.9
ELO Rating: 1712.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1757.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 274.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 29.1
Clay: 17.1
Grass: 12.1
Serve Rating: 95.9
Return Rating: 85.7

Recent Matches

Ignacio Buse

  • Last Match: vs Jakub Mensik (1-0) clay Hamburg 62 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Flavio Cobolli (2-0) clay Hamburg 91 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Hugo Gaston (2-0) clay Hamburg 71 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Niels McDonald (2-0) clay Hamburg 69 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Frances Tiafoe (1-2) clay Rome 163 min

Ugo Humbert

  • Last Match: vs Karen Khachanov (2-1) clay Hamburg 133 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Justin Engel (2-1) clay Hamburg 141 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Dino Prizmic (0-2) clay Rome 80 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Vit Kopriva (2-0) clay Rome 75 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Terence Atmane (0-2) clay Madrid 136 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Ignacio Buse
vs
0
Ugo Humbert
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

In the Hamburg quarterfinals on clay (500-level event in Germany), Ugo Humbert is forecast to advance over Ignacio Buse. The model gives Humbert a 59.45% chance to win against Buse’s 40.55%, with a predicted total of about 27.9 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Humbert arrives with the higher ranking (No. 33 vs No. 62) and the superior Elo (1712.50 to 1672.50), though form indexes are reasonably close (Humbert 50.91, Buse 56.17). Fatigue is notable for both after multiple rounds in Hamburg, but Buse has spent slightly more time on court (293 minutes) than Humbert (274 minutes). Neither player projects as a clay specialist—surface strength indices are modest for both (Buse 20.47, Humbert 17.13)—so neutral clay traits will matter more than specialist instincts. Serve profiles are almost identical (mean serve index 95.67 for Buse, 95.92 for Humbert), so there’s no clear serving edge. However, Buse’s mean return index (93.83) is meaningfully higher than Humbert’s (85.65), suggesting Buse will generate more pressure on return games and create break opportunities. That return advantage is likely to be a decisive tactical factor on slow clay. Buse has been efficient in Hamburg, winning his three matches in straight sets with relatively short match times (62, 91, 71 minutes). Humbert’s route has been tougher: two wins in Hamburg that went the distance (133 and 141 minutes) after a prior loss in Rome. Those longer matches hint at match toughness but also greater cumulative exertion for Humbert.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 27.9 Most likely outcome: 28 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Ignacio Buse - Ugo Humbert) -0.7 Most likely spread: -1 (Ugo Humbert wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. Positive values indicate Ignacio Buse winning more games, negative values indicate Ugo Humbert winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this quarterfinal sits at about 11.0 total while the predicted double faults total is roughly 5.06. On clay, expected aces are suppressed by the slower, higher bounce, and the expected double faults can rise late as fatigue sets in. With nearly identical serve ratings, neither player offers a strong edge for a large increase in predicted aces.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 11.0 Most likely: 11 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.1 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Ignacio Buse versus Ugo Humbert. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

43.7% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Ignacio Buse's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (35.7%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Ignacio Buse's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Humbert’s higher ranking, Elo and experience in long matches give him the narrow edge, while Buse’s superior return game is the clearest vulnerability Humbert must manage. The key factor to watch will be Buse’s ability to convert return pressure into early breaks; if he does, the match could be tighter than the probabilities suggest.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel