Geneva Switzerland Clay Atp 250 Semifinals

Learner Tien vs Alexander Bublik: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Learner Tien

Rank: #21
40%
VS

Alexander Bublik

Rank: #11
60%
Expected Total Games: 28.4
Predicted Winner: Alexander Bublik

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Learner Tien

Form Index: 52.5
ELO Rating: 1778.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1815.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 109.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 39.8
Clay: 18.5
Grass: 16.1
Serve Rating: 95.4
Return Rating: 93.0

Alexander Bublik

Form Index: 23.3
ELO Rating: 1723.7
Glicko2 Rating: 1818.0
Current Fatigue (minutes): 79.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 34.2
Clay: 34.4
Grass: 34.9
Serve Rating: 95.5
Return Rating: 84.2

Recent Matches

Learner Tien

Alexander Bublik

  • Last Match: vs Edas Butvilas (2-0) clay Geneva 79 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Learner Tien (1-2) clay Rome 127 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Sebastian Baez (2-0) clay Rome 59 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Stefanos Tsitsipas (0-2) clay Madrid 73 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Alex Molcan (0-2) clay Munich 65 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

1
Learner Tien
vs
0
Alexander Bublik
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
1 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

In the Geneva semifinals on clay at this 250-level event, Alexander Bublik is narrowly favoured to beat Learner Tien. The model gives Bublik a 60.06% chance of victory to Tien’s 39.94%, with a predicted total of about 28.43 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Tien arrives ranked 21 with a stronger short-term form index (52.48) and a higher Elo (1778.46) than Bublik, who is ranked 11 but carries a lower form index (23.25) and an Elo of 1723.66. Fatigue is a factor: Tien has logged 109 minutes at this tournament compared with Bublik’s 79, which could matter on slow clay. Surface strength points to Bublik (34.45) having the edge on clay relative to Tien (18.48). Their mean serve indices are virtually identical, so serve power alone shouldn’t separate them, but Tien’s mean return index (92.99) is notably higher than Bublik’s (84.15), a gap of roughly 8.8 points that favors Tien when returning. Looking at recent results, Tien has been solid in this stretch—he beat Stefanos Tsitsipas in Geneva and beat Bublik in Rome (2-1), though he also lost in Rome to Rafael Jodar. Bublik has won his last two recorded matches (Edas Butvilas in Geneva and Sebastian Baez in Rome) but was the victim of Tien’s Rome upset. That head-to-head from Rome provides Tien a recent matchup blueprint, while Bublik’s fresher legs and better clay profile suggest he can adapt.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 28.4 Most likely outcome: 28 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Learner Tien - Alexander Bublik) -1.1 Most likely spread: -2 (Alexander Bublik wins 2 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. Positive values indicate Learner Tien winning more games, negative values indicate Alexander Bublik winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

Aces prediction for this tie sits at about 13.5 combined, while the predicted aces figure is tempered by clay’s slower bounce. The expected double faults total is 5.57, reflecting how longer rallies and fatigue on clay can inflate error counts. There is no significant gap in serve ratings between the two, so the ace count is likely balanced rather than skewed toward a single big server.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 13.5 Most likely: 13 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.6 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Learner Tien versus Alexander Bublik. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

42.0% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Learner Tien's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (33.2%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Learner Tien's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Bublik’s combination of superior clay-specific strength and lower fatigue gives him the edge despite Tien’s higher Elo and stronger return metrics. The key factor to watch will be Tien’s returning ability versus Bublik’s serve consistency and movement on clay; that duel should decide which way the semifinal swings.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel