Toronto Canada Hard Masters 1000 Round of 32

Terence Atmane vs Jakub Mensik: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Terence Atmane

Rank: #56
34%
VS

Jakub Mensik

Rank: #17
66%
Expected Total Games: 25.4
Predicted Winner: Jakub Mensik

Why the Model Favors Jakub Mensik

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Recent record by level +7.8 Jakub Mensik
Recent form +6.5 Terence Atmane
Surface fit +3.9 Jakub Mensik
Overall strength +3.8 Jakub Mensik
Serve & return game +3.4 Jakub Mensik

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 66% for Jakub Mensik. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network, not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude and Perplexity. Query these predictions in plain language: our native connector lets your AI assistant call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Terence Atmane

Form Index: 48.2
ELO Rating: 1665.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1661.7
Current Fatigue (minutes): 218.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 29.7
Clay: 13.7
Grass: 8.9
Serve Rating: 96.6
Return Rating: 86.9

Jakub Mensik

Form Index: 53.1
ELO Rating: 1808.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1858.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 127.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 37.6
Clay: 39.9
Grass: 18.9
Serve Rating: 96.2
Return Rating: 86.9

Recent Matches

Terence Atmane

Jakub Mensik

  • Last Match: vs Jacob Fearnley (2-1) hard Toronto 127 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Brandon Nakashima (1-2) hard Washington 134 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Trevor Svajda (2-1) hard Washington 136 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Grigor Dimitrov (1-3) grass Wimbledon 174 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Toby Samuel (3-2) grass Wimbledon 174 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Terence Atmane
vs
0
Jakub Mensik
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At the Toronto Masters 1000 on hard courts in the Round of 32, Jakub Mensik is forecast to advance over Terence Atmane. The model gives Mensik a 66.08% chance to win versus 33.92% for Atmane, with a predicted total of about 25.4 games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Mensik comes mainly from his recent record by level and overall strength — factors that reflect his deeper results against stronger opposition and a higher Elo. Mensik’s ranking (17) and Elo (1808.8) sit well above Atmane’s (rank 56, Elo 1665.5), and that gap is reflected in the model drivers: recent record by level (+7.8 points toward Mensik), overall strength (+3.8), surface fit (+3.9) and serve & return game (+3.4) all tilt toward him. Atmane, however, earns a counterweight from recent form (+6.5 toward Atmane) after impressive back-to-back Toronto wins. Looking at the underlying numbers, Mensik’s form index (53.08) slightly exceeds Atmane’s (48.24), and Mensik has lower cumulative fatigue this week (127 minutes versus Atmane’s 218), which may matter in a physical hard-court setting. Mensik also posts a higher surface strength index (37.59 to 29.70). Serve and return indices are nearly identical (mean serve: 96.23 vs 96.61; mean return: 86.91 vs 86.90), so neither player has a clear serving or returning edge on paper. Over their last three matches, Atmane is 2-1 in Toronto/Washington with wins over Jack Draper and Karen Khachanov and a loss to Alejandro Tabilo, while Mensik is also 2-1 with wins over Jacob Fearnley and Trevor Svajda and a loss to Brandon Nakashima.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 25.4 Most likely outcome: 25 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Terence Atmane - Jakub Mensik) -2.5 Most likely spread: -3 (Jakub Mensik wins 3 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. Positive values indicate Terence Atmane winning more games, negative values indicate Jakub Mensik winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for the match is about 19.76 total, with a double faults prediction around 8.13 (expected double faults). On medium-paced hard courts, this projected ace count is consistent with a balance between big serving and return aggression; use of predicted aces and expected double faults suggests serve holds will be important. Since the two players’ serve ratings are nearly identical, neither player alone is expected to drive a markedly higher ace count.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 19.8 Most likely: 19 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 8.1 Most likely: 8 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. The chart shows the predicted probability for each double-fault count.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Terence Atmane versus Jakub Mensik. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

51.0% Predicted: Tiebreak likely

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Terence Atmane's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (41.9%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Terence Atmane's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Mensik’s advantage is driven chiefly by recent record by level and a stronger Elo/ranking profile. Keep an eye on fatigue and early breaks — the top model key factor (recent record by level) and serve/return exchanges will likely decide whether Mensik converts the model edge into a straight-sets victory.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel