Eastbourne Great Britain Grass Atp 250 Round of 16

Ugo Humbert vs Jenson Brooksby: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Ugo Humbert

Rank: #30
56%
VS

Jenson Brooksby

Rank: #67
44%
Expected Total Games: 24.8
Predicted Winner: Ugo Humbert

Why the Model Favors Ugo Humbert

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Overall strength +11.0 Ugo Humbert
Surface fit +9.4 Jenson Brooksby
Serve & return game +8.1 Ugo Humbert
Overall record & opposition quality +2.7 Ugo Humbert
Head-to-head +2.5 Ugo Humbert

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 56% for Ugo Humbert. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Ugo Humbert

Form Index: 53.7
ELO Rating: 1710.0
Glicko2 Rating: 1765.5
Current Fatigue (minutes): 161.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 28.8
Clay: 15.4
Grass: 17.3
Serve Rating: 97.3
Return Rating: 92.2

Jenson Brooksby

Form Index: 22.8
ELO Rating: 1504.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1520.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 84.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 17.7
Clay: 14.9
Grass: 17.2
Serve Rating: 95.2
Return Rating: 88.3

Recent Matches

Ugo Humbert

Jenson Brooksby

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Ugo Humbert
vs
2
Jenson Brooksby
Hard
0 - 1
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 1

Key Prediction Insights

At Eastbourne in Great Britain, Round of 16 action on grass at this 250-level event pits Ugo Humbert against Jenson Brooksby. The model favors Humbert to advance (56.46% vs 43.54%) and projects a relatively short match of about 24.8 total games.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Humbert is driven first and foremost by overall strength, with serve & return play also tipping the scales in his direction; surface fit, however, nudges toward Brooksby. Humbert brings the higher ranking (30 vs 67), a stronger Elo (1710 vs 1504) and a far better form index (53.7 vs 22.8). Those numbers underpin the +11.0 percentage-point contribution from overall strength and the +8.1 points from serve & return. Brooksby’s surface fit shows a small advantage (+9.4 points toward him in the explainability outputs), though both players have nearly identical surface strength indices (Humbert 17.34, Brooksby 17.22). Fatigue and recent results complicate the picture. Humbert has logged 161 minutes in this event so far and comes off a hard-fought three-set win over Mattia Bellucci, plus a straight-sets loss to Tommy Paul and a win over Rinky Hijikata — a mixed but competitive run. Brooksby has been fresher (84 minutes) with wins over Aleksandar Vukic and Martin Damm and a narrow loss to Francisco Cerundolo, indicating steadier recent outcomes but lower form index. Serve and return indices favor Humbert slightly (serve 97.33 vs 95.19; return 92.16 vs 88.27), though neither gap exceeds five points, so neither side has a dominant statistical serving edge.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.8 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Ugo Humbert - Jenson Brooksby) +0.3 Most likely spread: 0 (even number of games won)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. Positive values indicate Ugo Humbert winning more games, negative values indicate Jenson Brooksby winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for the match is 13.15; the predicted aces total reflects grass being the fastest surface and typically elevating ace counts. The expected double faults tally is 5.02. Both players carry high serve ratings, so the predicted aces are driven more by the surface than a single player’s markedly superior serving profile.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 13.2 Most likely: 13 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.0 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Ugo Humbert versus Jenson Brooksby. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

39.4% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Ugo Humbert's perspective)

2-0 Most likely set score (31.9%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Ugo Humbert's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Humbert’s advantage comes chiefly from overall strength as captured by ranking, Elo and form metrics. Keep an eye on his physical wear — and how his serve/return holds up — as that will be the key factor determining whether the model’s slight edge holds through to the finish.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel