Mallorca Spain Grass Atp 250 Round of 16

Vit Kopriva vs Ignacio Buse: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Vit Kopriva

Rank: #64
44%
VS

Ignacio Buse

Rank: #35
56%
Expected Total Games: 22.9
Predicted Winner: Ignacio Buse

Why the Model Favors Ignacio Buse

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Age +3.7 Ignacio Buse
Serve & return game +2.9 Vit Kopriva
Overall record & opposition quality +1.8 Ignacio Buse
Recent form +1.6 Vit Kopriva
Overall strength +0.9 Ignacio Buse

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 56% for Ignacio Buse. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Vit Kopriva

Form Index: 39.9
ELO Rating: 1662.3
Glicko2 Rating: 1702.7
Current Fatigue (minutes): 80.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 15.7
Clay: 22.0
Grass: 7.1
Serve Rating: 95.3
Return Rating: 95.3

Ignacio Buse

Form Index: 53.5
ELO Rating: 1717.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1767.3
Current Fatigue (minutes): 111.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 19.2
Clay: 26.0
Grass: 9.1
Serve Rating: 95.7
Return Rating: 88.5

Recent Matches

Vit Kopriva

Ignacio Buse

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Vit Kopriva
vs
0
Ignacio Buse
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Mallorca, Round of 16 on grass at an ATP 250 event sets up a contrast in styles between Vit Kopriva and Ignacio Buse. The model favors Ignacio Buse to advance (56.35%) over Vit Kopriva (43.65%), with a predicted total of about 22.9 games in the match — a scoreline likely to be two tight sets rather than a long three-set battle.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Buse is driven primarily by age-related factors and his overall record/opposition quality, with smaller contributions from overall strength; Kopriva picks up ground via serve-and-return metrics and recent performances. Buse sits higher in the rankings (No. 35 vs No. 64), carries a higher form_index (53.5 vs 39.9) and a superior Elo (1717 vs 1662), but also more court time in this event (111 vs 80 minutes), which could matter late in rallies on grass. Kopriva’s surface strength index is slightly lower (7.10) than Buse’s (9.13), though both indexes are modest. Where Kopriva threatens is in return quality: his mean return index (95.25) comfortably exceeds Buse’s (88.54) by more than five points, which is reflected in the model giving Kopriva a boost for serve & return. Their serve indexes are nearly identical (95.34 vs 95.71), so neither should have a large serving-only edge. Recent form shows Buse at 2–1 in his last three, including a straight-sets win over Stefanos Tsitsipas in Mallorca, while Kopriva is 1–2 in that stretch with a Mallorca win but losses to higher seeds at Halle and Roland Garros.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 22.9 Most likely outcome: 22 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Vit Kopriva - Ignacio Buse) -0.7 Most likely spread: -1 (Ignacio Buse wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. Positive values indicate Vit Kopriva winning more games, negative values indicate Ignacio Buse winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

Aces prediction for the match sits at about 11.14 total — consistent with grass favoring big, flat serving and producing more aces. The predicted aces reflect both players’ strong serve indexes, even though neither has a clear serve advantage. The double faults prediction is 5.77 expected double faults; slightly elevated fatigue (especially for Buse) could nudge that number higher as pressure points accumulate.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 11.1 Most likely: 11 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.8 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Vit Kopriva versus Ignacio Buse. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

37.7% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Vit Kopriva's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (33.5%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Vit Kopriva's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Buse’s edge comes mainly from the model’s top factor — age — supplemented by his higher ranking and Elo. Key factor to watch: Kopriva’s return game, which is the single tactical element most likely to upset the projected outcome on this fast grass court.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel