Geneva Switzerland Clay Atp 250 Round of 32

Adrian Mannarino vs Raphael Collignon: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Adrian Mannarino

Rank: #45
24%
VS

Raphael Collignon

Rank: #68
76%
Expected Total Games: 24.8
Predicted Winner: Raphael Collignon

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Adrian Mannarino

Form Index: 22.2
ELO Rating: 1458.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1517.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 21.1
Clay: 0.0
Grass: 22.3
Serve Rating: 95.6
Return Rating: 92.6

Raphael Collignon

Form Index: 36.9
ELO Rating: 1611.4
Glicko2 Rating: 1693.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 23.4
Clay: 10.1
Grass: 7.1
Serve Rating: 95.0
Return Rating: 87.3

Recent Matches

Adrian Mannarino

  • Last Match: vs Damir Dzumhur (0-2) clay Rome 90 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Ignacio Buse (0-2) clay Madrid 83 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Nuno Borges (0-2) clay Barcelona 82 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Zizou Bergs (0-2) clay Monte Carlo 81 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Daniel Merida (1-2) clay Bucharest 113 min

Raphael Collignon

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Adrian Mannarino
vs
0
Raphael Collignon
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Geneva, Switzerland — round of 32 on clay at an ATP 250 event sets up a stylistic clash between veteran Adrian Mannarino and rising Raphael Collignon. The model heavily favors Collignon (76.29% win probability) over Mannarino (23.71%), with a predicted total of about 24.8 games in the match, suggesting a straight-sets finish is most likely.

Match Analysis

Mannarino enters ranked 45 with an Elo of 1458.48 and a low form index (22.20). His reported surface strength is 0.0 and cumulative tournament fatigue is nil, but his recent clay results show three straight losses in Rome, Madrid and Barcelona, all in straight sets. Collignon, ranked 68, posts a higher Elo (1611.38) and a stronger form index (36.86). His surface strength index (10.09) and fatigue are modest, and his recent run includes back-to-back wins in Miami before a third-round loss; those matches included longer encounters, signaling recent match toughness. Looking deeper at the numbers, Mannarino’s mean return index (92.61) is notably higher than Collignon’s (87.32) — a difference greater than five points — which suggests Mannarino can exert significant pressure on returns. Serve profiles, however, are nearly identical: mean serve indices of 95.64 (Mannarino) and 95.04 (Collignon) show no meaningful serving gap. Recent form contrasts sharply: Mannarino’s last three clay outings were all defeats without set wins, while Collignon has two wins and a hard-court loss, indicating more consistency in recent results.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.8 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Adrian Mannarino - Raphael Collignon) -2.0 Most likely spread: -3 (Raphael Collignon wins 3 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. Positive values indicate Adrian Mannarino winning more games, negative values indicate Raphael Collignon winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this clay contest sits at about 9.41 total, while the double faults prediction is around 5.35 expected double faults. Clay’s slower pace and higher bounce typically reduce ace rates and can elevate double faults over long rallies; that dynamic underpins the predicted aces and expected double faults. Neither player has a significantly higher serve rating to markedly inflate the predicted aces, so the likely distribution of service points should keep ace totals moderate.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 9.4 Most likely: 9 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.3 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Adrian Mannarino versus Raphael Collignon. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

35.0% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Adrian Mannarino's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (55.1%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Adrian Mannarino's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Collignon’s higher Elo, better recent form and absence of match losses on similar competitive stretches give him the edge in Geneva. Key factor to watch: Mannarino’s returning quality — if he can convert that return advantage into break opportunities early, he’s the only realistic route to upset.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel