Madrid Spain Clay Masters 1000 Round of 32

Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Flavio Cobolli: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Adolfo Daniel Vallejo

Rank: #96
36%
VS

Flavio Cobolli

Rank: #13
64%
Expected Total Games: 23.0
Predicted Winner: Flavio Cobolli

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Adolfo Daniel Vallejo

Form Index: 89.4
ELO Rating: 1696.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1764.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 376.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 51.9
Clay: 41.6
Grass: 39.9
Serve Rating: 61.6
Return Rating: 82.4

Flavio Cobolli

Form Index: 68.1
ELO Rating: 1754.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1798.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 147.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 55.6
Clay: 45.9
Grass: 46.7
Serve Rating: 97.2
Return Rating: 90.4

Recent Matches

Adolfo Daniel Vallejo

Flavio Cobolli

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
vs
0
Flavio Cobolli
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At the Madrid Masters 1000 on clay, Round of 32 pits No. 96 Adolfo Daniel Vallejo against No. 13 Flavio Cobolli in a matchup that contrasts an in-form underdog with a top-15 seed. The model favors Flavio Cobolli to win (64.35%) over Vallejo (35.65%), with a projected total of about 23.02 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Cobolli arrives with the higher ranking (13) and superior Elo (1754.2 vs 1696.8), while Vallejo’s form index (89.37) is markedly higher than Cobolli’s (68.13), signaling recent confidence for the Argentine. Fatigue is a significant factor: Vallejo has logged 376 minutes on court in Madrid so far versus Cobolli’s 147, which could blunt Vallejo’s legs late. On clay both players show modest surface strength indices (Vallejo 41.65; Cobolli 45.90), suggesting neither is a dominant clay specialist here. There is a large gap in serving metrics: Cobolli’s mean serve index (97.21) eclipses Vallejo’s (61.56) by more than 5 points — a clear serving advantage for Cobolli. Their mean return indices also differ by over 5 points (Cobolli 90.43; Vallejo 82.42), indicating Cobolli is stronger on both serve and return in the underlying data. Over the last three matches Vallejo is unbeaten in Madrid (three straight wins including a straight-sets win over Dimitrov), showing excellent tournament form. Cobolli has two wins from his last three, including a long three-set victory in Madrid and a loss in Munich, so his recent results are solid but less consistent.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 23.0 Most likely outcome: 23 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Adolfo Daniel Vallejo - Flavio Cobolli) +4.1 Most likely spread: +4 (Adolfo Daniel Vallejo wins 4 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. Positive values indicate Adolfo Daniel Vallejo winning more games, negative values indicate Flavio Cobolli winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction sits at about 12.32 for the match, while the double faults prediction is 5.67. On clay, expected aces are naturally lower because the slower surface and higher bounce reduce raw serve penetration; this tempers the predicted aces total. Given Cobolli’s significantly higher serve rating, he is likely to account for a large share of the predicted aces, while Vallejo’s lower serve index suggests fewer service winners but possible pressure-induced errors.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 12.3 Most likely: 12 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 5.7 Most likely: 5 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Adolfo Daniel Vallejo versus Flavio Cobolli. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Cobolli’s edge comes from superior serving and return metrics combined with a higher ranking and Elo, despite Vallejo’s red-hot form and heavy court time. The key factor to watch will be whether Vallejo’s accumulated minutes sap his mobility late, allowing Cobolli’s serve to dictate short points.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel