Rome Italy Clay Masters 1000 Round of 32

Mariano Navone vs Hamad Medjedovic: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Mariano Navone

Rank: #44
39%
VS

Hamad Medjedovic

Rank: #67
61%
Expected Total Games: 27.3
Predicted Winner: Hamad Medjedovic

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Mariano Navone

Form Index: 58.6
ELO Rating: 1707.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1739.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 276.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 6.2
Clay: 29.3
Grass: 10.9
Serve Rating: 95.2
Return Rating: 95.3

Hamad Medjedovic

Form Index: 65.3
ELO Rating: 1730.6
Glicko2 Rating: 1777.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 246.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 20.6
Clay: 26.3
Grass: 7.4
Serve Rating: 95.9
Return Rating: 86.0

Recent Matches

Mariano Navone

Hamad Medjedovic

  • Last Match: vs Joao Fonseca (2-1) clay Rome 144 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Valentin Royer (2-0) clay Rome 102 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Andrey Rublev (1-2) clay Barcelona 118 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Nuno Borges (2-0) clay Barcelona 94 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Alex de Minaur (2-0) clay Barcelona 95 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Mariano Navone
vs
1
Hamad Medjedovic
Hard
0 - 1
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Rome, clay, Round of 32 at a Masters 1000 event sets a demanding stage for Mariano Navone and Hamad Medjedovic. The model favors Medjedovic (60.59%) over Navone (39.41%) and projects a competitive match of roughly 27.29 total games.

Match Analysis

Navone arrives ranked 44 with an Elo of 1707 and a form index of 58.6; he has logged 276 minutes on court so far in this tournament. His surface strength index on clay is 29.3 and his return metrics are outstanding (mean return 95.31), which underpins the wins over Felix Auger‑Aliassime and Denis Shapovalov in Rome. Those two victories included long rallies and a 173‑minute battle, indicating both confidence and accumulated wear. Medjedovic, ranked 67, carries a slightly higher Elo (1730.6) and a stronger current form index (65.25) while having 246 minutes of court time in Rome. His surface index is comparable (26.3) and his mean serve index (95.87) is on par with Navone’s, but his mean return (86.01) lags behind by more than 5 points—an important differential. Medjedovic has been steady through Rome with wins over Joao Fonseca and Valentin Royer after a recent loss to Andrey Rublev in Barcelona. The combination of Medjedovic’s higher Elo and better form, against Navone’s superior return game and slightly greater fatigue, frames this as a clash between steadiness and aggressive returning.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 27.3 Most likely outcome: 27 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Mariano Navone - Hamad Medjedovic) -1.1 Most likely spread: -2 (Hamad Medjedovic wins 2 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. Positive values indicate Mariano Navone winning more games, negative values indicate Hamad Medjedovic winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction sits at a modest 7.63 for the match and the predicted aces reflect clay’s tendency to suppress serve winners. Expected double faults are 4.61; clay’s longer points and the tournament fatigue figures make the expected double faults a relevant concern, especially for the player with heavier minutes on court. With both players’ serve indices nearly identical, there is no clear ace advantage despite Medjedovic’s slight edge in serving metrics.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 7.6 Most likely: 7 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.6 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Mariano Navone versus Hamad Medjedovic. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

34.2% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Mariano Navone's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (34.8%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Mariano Navone's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Medjedovic’s higher Elo and sharper recent form give him the edge, while Navone’s elite return and heavier court time create the principal variables to watch. The key factor will be whether Navone’s return pressure and stamina survive the match or if Medjedovic’s consistency on serve and form dictate the tempo.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel