Wimbledon Great Britain Grass Grand Slam Round of 32

Hubert Hurkacz vs Tommy Paul: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Hubert Hurkacz

Rank: #96
35%
VS

Tommy Paul

Rank: #25
65%
Expected Total Games: 37.8
Predicted Winner: Tommy Paul

Why the Model Favors Tommy Paul

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Surface fit +9.2 Tommy Paul
Recent form +7.1 Hubert Hurkacz
Overall strength +6.8 Tommy Paul
Head-to-head +0.9 Hubert Hurkacz
Overall record & opposition quality +0.8 Tommy Paul

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 65% for Tommy Paul. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Hubert Hurkacz

Form Index: 60.5
ELO Rating: 1689.0
Glicko2 Rating: 1653.4
Current Fatigue (minutes): 348.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 15.6
Clay: 23.1
Grass: 19.8
Serve Rating: 97.6
Return Rating: 90.3

Tommy Paul

Form Index: 71.5
ELO Rating: 1864.9
Glicko2 Rating: 1895.5
Current Fatigue (minutes): 348.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 36.7
Clay: 37.5
Grass: 26.2
Serve Rating: 96.1
Return Rating: 89.6

Recent Matches

Hubert Hurkacz

Tommy Paul

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Hubert Hurkacz
vs
1
Tommy Paul
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 1
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At Wimbledon in London, Round of 32 on grass, Tommy Paul is the model's pick to beat Hubert Hurkacz in this Grand Slam match. The prediction gives Paul a 64.95% chance to win versus 35.05% for Hurkacz, with an expected total of about 37.75 games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Paul comes mainly from surface fit and overall strength: surface fit pushes the probability 9.2 points toward Paul, while overall strength adds another 6.8 points. Paul’s higher Elo (1864.9 vs Hurkacz’s 1689.0) and superior rank (25 vs 96) underline that numerical edge, and his surface strength index (26.15) is also modestly better than Hurkacz’s (19.79), which is meaningful on quick grass courts. Recent form slightly favors Hurkacz (the model gave him a 7.1-point boost for form), reflecting his two straight wins at Wimbledon, but that advantage isn’t enough to overcome Paul’s overall metrics. Both players bring heavy serving profiles—Hurkacz’s mean serve index is 97.58 and Paul’s 96.09—so neither holds a serve-rating gap greater than five points. Return indices are likewise close (Hurkacz 90.30, Paul 89.60). Fatigue is identical in the dataset (348 minutes each), so recovery shouldn’t be a differentiator. Over the last three matches, each came through a pair of straight-set wins at Wimbledon before an earlier grass loss: Hurkacz defeated Ofner and Ruud in straights, while Paul beat Kwon and Muller, with both players having one recent grass defeat in the preceding weeks.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 37.8 Most likely outcome: 37 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Hubert Hurkacz - Tommy Paul) -2.7 Most likely spread: -3 (Tommy Paul wins 3 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. Positive values indicate Hubert Hurkacz winning more games, negative values indicate Tommy Paul winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

This match has a high aces prediction: the model forecasts about 24.21 total aces and 7.1 expected double faults. On fast grass, predicted aces are elevated because servers get more free points; given both players’ very strong serve indices, both should contribute significantly to the ace count. The double faults prediction is moderate, reflecting aggressive serving but generally solid serving metrics for both.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 24.2 Most likely: 24 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 7.1 Most likely: 7 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Hubert Hurkacz versus Tommy Paul. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

57.4% Predicted: Tiebreak likely

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Hubert Hurkacz's perspective)

0-3 Most likely set score (35.1%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Hubert Hurkacz's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Paul’s advantage is driven chiefly by surface fit and his stronger overall rating. The key factor to watch will be serve holds and the few return opportunities—on grass, the player who converts the limited break chances will likely decide the match.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel