Us Open NY, U.S.A. Hard Grand Slam Round of 128

Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Jan-Lennard Struff: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Rank: #76
47%
VS

Jan-Lennard Struff

Rank: #44
53%
Expected Total Games: 38.9
Predicted Winner: Jan-Lennard Struff

Why the Model Favors Jan-Lennard Struff

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Age +4.3 Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Overall record & opposition quality +2.9 Jan-Lennard Struff
Surface fit +2.6 Jan-Lennard Struff
Fatigue & recent workload +0.6 Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 53% for Jan-Lennard Struff. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network, not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude and Perplexity. Query these predictions in plain language: our native connector lets your AI assistant call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Form Index: 29.0
ELO Rating: 1536.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1626.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 13.0
Clay: 20.5
Grass: 3.8
Serve Rating: 95.4
Return Rating: 88.6

Jan-Lennard Struff

Form Index: 42.9
ELO Rating: 1697.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1669.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 15.0
Clay: 16.9
Grass: 31.5
Serve Rating: 95.4
Return Rating: 85.0

Recent Matches

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Jan-Lennard Struff

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
vs
0
Jan-Lennard Struff
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At the 2026 US Open in New York, a first round hard court match between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Jan-Lennard Struff projects as a tight matchup. The model favors Jan-Lennard Struff to win with a 52.79% probability, while Camilo Ugo Carabelli is given a 47.21% chance. The expected total number of games in the match is about 38.94.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Jan-Lennard Struff comes mainly from overall record and opposition quality, and from a slightly better surface fit for hard courts. Supporting that, Struff arrives with a higher ranking (44 versus 76), a superior Elo rating (1698.1 versus 1536.6), and a stronger form index (42.57 versus 28.69). Struff’s surface strength index is marginally higher (14.98 versus 12.88), which is reflected in the small model boost toward him on hard courts. The model also awards a modest 4.3 percentage point boost to Carabelli due to age, and a 0.6 point tilt for recent workload toward Carabelli. Both players show similar service profiles by the mean serve index, so there is no large serving gap to exploit. Carabelli has a slightly higher mean return index (88.57 versus 84.96), which supports his ability to create pressure on Struff’s serve. Fatigue reads zero for both in the current event, so match-to-match workload is not an immediate factor. Recent form favors Struff by results. Carabelli has lost his last three matches (Cincinnati, Toronto, Estoril), while Struff has one win in his last three outings, including a long 144 minute victory in Cincinnati and two recent defeats.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 38.9 Most likely outcome: 37 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Camilo Ugo Carabelli - Jan-Lennard Struff) -0.4 Most likely spread: -1 (Jan-Lennard Struff wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. Positive values indicate Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning more games, negative values indicate Jan-Lennard Struff winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this hard court match is 18.57 total aces, with predicted aces split of 8.32 for Carabelli and 10.52 for Struff. The expected double faults total is 9.02, split as 4.34 for Carabelli and 4.69 for Struff. On a medium paced hard court, these predicted aces reflect a balanced serve-friendly surface where powerful servers and returners both find opportunities. Neither player posts a significantly higher serve rating, but the per player ace projections still show Struff slightly ahead at 10.52 versus 8.32.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 18.6 Most likely: 16 aces Per player: Camilo Ugo Carabelli 8.3 + Jan-Lennard Struff 10.5
Expected Total Double Faults 9.0 Most likely: 8 double faults Per player: Camilo Ugo Carabelli 4.3 + Jan-Lennard Struff 4.7

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

🎯 Aces by Player

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Expected 8.3 aces

Probability distribution for the aces Camilo Ugo Carabelli serves in this match.
Jan-Lennard Struff

Expected 10.5 aces

Probability distribution for the aces Jan-Lennard Struff serves in this match.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The chart shows the predicted probability for each double-fault count.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Jan-Lennard Struff. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Double Faults by Player

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Expected 4.3 double faults

Probability distribution for the double faults Camilo Ugo Carabelli serves in this match.
Jan-Lennard Struff

Expected 4.7 double faults

Probability distribution for the double faults Jan-Lennard Struff serves in this match.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

40.2% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Camilo Ugo Carabelli's perspective)

0-3 Most likely set score (27.7%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Camilo Ugo Carabelli's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Jan-Lennard Struff’s narrow edge comes primarily from the model’s assessment of his overall record and quality of opposition, supported by higher ranking and Elo. A key factor to watch is return efficiency early in the match, where Carabelli’s stronger return index could flip momentum if he breaks serve often.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel