Buenos Aires Argentina Clay Atp 250 Quarterfinals

Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Sebastian Baez: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Rank: #48
42%
VS

Sebastian Baez

Rank: #35
58%
Expected Total Games: 22.0
Predicted Winner: Sebastian Baez

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Form Index: 37.7
ELO Rating: 975.0
Glicko2 Rating: 1562.3
Current Fatigue (minutes): 247.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 5.4
Clay: 7.3
Grass: 7.1
Serve Rating: 76.2
Return Rating: 71.7

Sebastian Baez

Form Index: 52.2
ELO Rating: 1284.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1678.3
Current Fatigue (minutes): 83.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 8.8
Clay: 8.8
Grass: 10.0
Serve Rating: 97.2
Return Rating: 94.0

Recent Matches

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Sebastian Baez

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

1
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
vs
3
Sebastian Baez
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
1 - 3
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Quarterfinal action in Buenos Aires on clay sees Camilo Ugo Carabelli face Sebastian Baez in an atp_250 event in Argentina. The model favors Baez, who is predicted to win with a 58.20% probability versus 41.80% for Carabelli, and the match is projected to contain about 22.01 games.

Match Analysis

Baez arrives ranked 35 with a stronger form index (52.18) and a considerably higher Elo (1284.54) than Carabelli, who is ranked 48 with a form index of 37.69 and an Elo of 975.03. Fatigue is a clear differentiator: Carabelli has accumulated 247 minutes on court this week versus Baez’s 83, which could affect physical sharpness late in rallies on the demanding clay. Surface strength indices are relatively close (Carabelli 7.30, Baez 8.84), so neither player has a decisive clay-specialist edge from those metrics. Serve and return profiles strongly favor Baez. His mean serve index (97.22) tops Carabelli’s (76.22) by more than 20 points, and his mean return index (93.97) similarly exceeds Carabelli’s (71.72) by roughly the same margin—differences large enough to expect Baez to impose his game on both service and receiving phases. Recent form: Carabelli has won his two Buenos Aires matches in straight sets after a long hard-court loss at the Australian Open, including lengthy 122–125 minute matches this week; Baez has also progressed comfortably, with a quick 83-minute win in his last match and mixed longer matches earlier in the season.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 22.0 Most likely outcome: 22 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Camilo Ugo Carabelli - Sebastian Baez) +1.1 Most likely spread: +1 (Camilo Ugo Carabelli wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. Positive values indicate Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning more games, negative values indicate Sebastian Baez winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this clay quarterfinal is modest: the predicted aces total is 13.22, reflecting clay’s slower bounce and reduced ace frequency. The expected double faults tally is 4.4; longer rallies and accumulated fatigue—notably for Carabelli—can raise the chance of late-match serving errors. Baez’s significantly higher serve rating suggests he will contribute disproportionately to the predicted aces count and may shorten points more often.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 13.2 Most likely: 13 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.4 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Camilo Ugo Carabelli versus Sebastian Baez. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Baez’s higher Elo, sharper recent form and dominant serve/return indices give him the edge in this matchup. The key factor to watch is whether Carabelli’s physical freshness holds up against Baez’s aggressive serve-and-return pressures through the latter stages of rallies.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel