Geneva Switzerland Clay Atp 250 Round of 32

Raul Brancaccio vs Stan Wawrinka: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Raul Brancaccio

Rank: #240
35%
VS

Stan Wawrinka

Rank: #125
65%
Expected Total Games: 24.8
Predicted Winner: Stan Wawrinka

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Raul Brancaccio

Form Index: 36.8
ELO Rating: 1511.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1496.3
Current Fatigue (minutes): 223.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 11.0
Clay: 9.0
Grass: 5.5
Serve Rating: 96.1
Return Rating: 96.2

Stan Wawrinka

Form Index: 39.9
ELO Rating: 1612.6
Glicko2 Rating: 1689.0
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 18.4
Clay: 6.5
Grass: 7.8
Serve Rating: 94.3
Return Rating: 86.6

Recent Matches

Raul Brancaccio

  • Last Match: vs Clement Tabur (1-1) clay Geneva 97 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Tyler Zink (2-1) clay Geneva 126 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs None (0-0) None None 0 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs None (0-0) None None 0 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs None (0-0) None None 0 min

Stan Wawrinka

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Raul Brancaccio
vs
0
Stan Wawrinka
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Geneva, Switzerland — round of 32 on clay at an ATP 250 event sees Raul Brancaccio face Stan Wawrinka. The model leans to Wawrinka as the likely winner: Stan 65.01% vs Brancaccio 34.99%, with an expected total of about 24.76 games in the match.

Match Analysis

On paper Wawrinka carries the higher profile: world No. 125 with an Elo of 1612.6, versus Brancaccio at No. 240 and an Elo of 1511.8. Form indices are similar (Brancaccio 36.76, Wawrinka 39.90), but fatigue is a clear differentiator — Brancaccio arrives with 223 minutes on court in this event while Wawrinka is fresh at 0 minutes. Both players show modest surface strength indices (Brancaccio 8.96, Wawrinka 6.51), indicating neither has a pronounced clay advantage from the provided metrics. Serve and return profiles matter here: their mean serve indexes are close (Brancaccio 96.10, Wawrinka 94.31), so no large serving gap is expected. However Brancaccio’s mean return index (96.21) is substantially higher than Wawrinka’s (86.56), a difference that suggests Brancaccio may generate more break opportunities if his legs hold up. Recent form is mixed — Brancaccio split two completed matches at Geneva (a win over Tyler Zink and a longer win/loss pattern including a 97-minute match vs Tabur), while Wawrinka has a recent win in Rome but two losses in Barcelona and Monte Carlo; those three outings for Stan include long matches that demonstrate resilience on clay.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.8 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Raul Brancaccio - Stan Wawrinka) -1.6 Most likely spread: -2 (Stan Wawrinka wins 2 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. Positive values indicate Raul Brancaccio winning more games, negative values indicate Stan Wawrinka winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this clay match is modest: the predicted aces total is 8.5, reflecting clay’s tendency to reduce free points. The predicted aces number and an expected double faults tally of 4.71 align with clay’s slower bounce and longer rallies. Because neither player holds a significantly superior serve rating, the predicted aces are spread rather than skewed to one server; expected double faults could rise if rallies and fatigue lengthen.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 8.5 Most likely: 8 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.7 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Raul Brancaccio versus Stan Wawrinka. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

34.1% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Raul Brancaccio's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (35.9%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Raul Brancaccio's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Wawrinka’s higher Elo, ranking and freshness give him the edge, while Brancaccio’s superior return metrics pose the main threat — particularly if his tournament fatigue can be managed. The key factor to watch will be how effectively Brancaccio converts return pressure into breaks early in sets.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel