Madrid Spain Clay Masters 1000 Round of 64

Vilius Gaubas vs Felix Auger-Aliassime: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Vilius Gaubas

Rank: #124
29%
VS

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Rank: #5
71%
Expected Total Games: 23.4
Predicted Winner: Felix Auger-Aliassime

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Vilius Gaubas

Form Index: 61.0
ELO Rating: 1663.7
Glicko2 Rating: 1709.0
Current Fatigue (minutes): 374.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 49.0
Clay: 42.1
Grass: 39.9
Serve Rating: 64.0
Return Rating: 73.5

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Form Index: 49.3
ELO Rating: 1842.1
Glicko2 Rating: 1929.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 62.1
Clay: 45.2
Grass: 46.9
Serve Rating: 98.6
Return Rating: 87.7

Recent Matches

Vilius Gaubas

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Vilius Gaubas
vs
0
Felix Auger-Aliassime
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

In Madrid, Spain, at the Masters 1000 clay event, this Round of 64 meeting pits rising Vilius Gaubas against top-10 seed Félix Auger‑Aliassime. The model favors Auger‑Aliassime (70.57%) over Gaubas (29.43%), with a predicted total of about 23.4 games in the match.

Match Analysis

Auger‑Aliassime arrives with a clear edge on paper: world No. 5 versus Gaubas at No. 124, and an Elo gap (1842.12 vs 1663.71) that reflects more consistent high‑level results. Gaubas’ form index (≈61) is actually higher than Félix’s (≈49), indicating recent momentum, but Gaubas carries heavy tournament fatigue — 374 minutes on court in Madrid — compared with Auger‑Aliassime, who has 0 minutes logged here. Surface strength indices are close (Gaubas 42.06, Auger‑Aliassime 45.23), so neither player has a large clay‑specific advantage by that measure. Serve and return profiles point to Auger‑Aliassime’s dominance in serve numbers: his mean serve index (≈98.6) outstrips Gaubas (≈64.0) by more than 5 points, and his mean return index (≈87.7) is also substantially higher than Gaubas’s (≈73.5). Those gaps suggest Auger‑Aliassime can both dictate on serve and be aggressive on return. Recent form diverges: Gaubas is unbeaten through three matches in Madrid (wins over Baez, Sakamoto and Gea, including a 202‑minute encounter), which explains the fatigue but also confidence; Auger‑Aliassime showed solid clay results in Monte‑Carlo (wins over Cilic and Ruud) before losing to Sinner.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 23.4 Most likely outcome: 23 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Vilius Gaubas - Felix Auger-Aliassime) -0.3 Most likely spread: -1 (Felix Auger-Aliassime wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. Positive values indicate Vilius Gaubas winning more games, negative values indicate Felix Auger-Aliassime winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this clay match is modest: the predicted aces total is about 10.8, and the expected double faults figure is roughly 3.6. Given clay’s slower speed and higher bounce, predicted aces are lower than on faster surfaces, while expected double faults can be elevated by long rallies and fatigue. With Auger‑Aliassime’s significantly higher serve rating, he is likely to account for the bulk of the predicted aces, while Gaubas’ accumulated court time could increase the expected double faults.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 10.8 Most likely: 10 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 3.6 Most likely: 3 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Vilius Gaubas versus Felix Auger-Aliassime. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Auger‑Aliassime’s higher ranking, superior Elo and markedly better serve/return indices give him the edge, especially when coupled with freshness. The key factor to watch is whether Gaubas’ hot streak and return quality can translate into early breaks before fatigue blunts his level.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel