Monte Carlo Monaco Clay Masters 1000 Quarterfinals

Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Jannik Sinner: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Rank: #7
17%
VS

Jannik Sinner

Rank: #2
83%
Expected Total Games: 23.1
Predicted Winner: Jannik Sinner

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Felix Auger-Aliassime

Form Index: 66.3
ELO Rating: 1844.4
Glicko2 Rating: 1931.0
Current Fatigue (minutes): 224.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 62.1
Clay: 45.3
Grass: 46.9
Serve Rating: 85.1
Return Rating: 58.1

Jannik Sinner

Form Index: 80.6
ELO Rating: 2475.3
Glicko2 Rating: 2614.9
Current Fatigue (minutes): 185.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 78.5
Clay: 64.0
Grass: 68.5
Serve Rating: 96.8
Return Rating: 89.0

Recent Matches

Felix Auger-Aliassime

  • Last Match: vs Casper Ruud (1-1) clay Monte Carlo 103 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Marin Cilic (2-0) clay Monte Carlo 121 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Terence Atmane (1-2) hard Miami 113 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Marton Fucsovics (2-0) hard Miami 130 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Arthur Fils (0-2) hard Indian Wells 111 min

Jannik Sinner

  • Last Match: vs Tomas Machac (2-1) clay Monte Carlo 121 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Ugo Humbert (2-0) clay Monte Carlo 64 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Jiri Lehecka (2-0) hard Miami 93 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Alexander Zverev (2-0) hard Miami 113 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Frances Tiafoe (2-0) hard Miami 71 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Felix Auger-Aliassime
vs
3
Jannik Sinner
Hard
0 - 3
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

This quarterfinal at the Monte‑Carlo Masters in Monaco comes on clay, the slowest surface, and pits Felix Auger‑Aliassime against Jannik Sinner. The model strongly favors Sinner (82.95%) over Auger‑Aliassime (17.05%), with a low expected total of 23.05 games for the match.

Match Analysis

Sinner arrives as the higher-ranked player (No. 2) with superior indicators across form (80.62 vs 66.28) and Elo (2475.31 vs 1844.38). He also shows a clearer clay advantage via a higher surface strength index (63.96 vs 45.27). Fatigue favors Sinner as well: Auger‑Aliassime has logged 224 minutes in the event versus Sinner’s 185, which can matter on long rallies typical of clay. The gap in mean serve index is notable (Sinner 96.81, Auger‑Aliassime 85.10 — >5 points), and the mean return index difference is even larger (Sinner 88.96, Auger‑Aliassime 58.06), suggesting Sinner will control both the serving and returning phases more often. Form in recent matches reinforces those numbers. Auger‑Aliassime has two wins at Monte‑Carlo (including Marin Cilic) and a loss in Miami to Terence Atmane — a mixed run with some heavy minutes on court. Sinner is unbeaten across his last three outings, dispatching Ugo Humbert comfortably, beating Tomas Machac in a longer match here, and taking Jiri Lehecka in Miami. The consistency in Sinner’s results and his superior return ability on clay underpins the prediction gap.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 23.1 Most likely outcome: 23 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Felix Auger-Aliassime - Jannik Sinner) -4.6 Most likely spread: -5 (Jannik Sinner wins 5 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. Positive values indicate Felix Auger-Aliassime winning more games, negative values indicate Jannik Sinner winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for the match is moderate: the model’s predicted aces total is 10.33. Clay tends to reduce ace opportunities because the slower, higher bounce gives returners time, so the predicted aces are tempered by surface. The double faults prediction sits at 4.89; longer rallies and accumulated minutes can raise the expected double faults. Given Sinner’s significantly higher serve rating, he should supply a larger share of the predicted aces while Auger‑Aliassime’s heavier minutes could increase his share of the expected double faults.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 10.3 Most likely: 10 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.9 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Felix Auger-Aliassime versus Jannik Sinner. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Sinner’s edge comes from a much higher Elo, stronger form, superior return metrics and a better clay profile, all amplified by a service edge that still functions on slower courts. The key factor to watch is Sinner’s return pressure—if he can break Auger‑Aliassime early, the match is likely to be short and follow the model’s low game total projection.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel