Wimbledon Great Britain Grass Grand Slam Round of 32

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Daniil Medvedev: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Jan-Lennard Struff

Rank: #74
7%
VS

Daniil Medvedev

Rank: #9
93%
Expected Total Games: 37.1
Predicted Winner: Daniil Medvedev

Why the Model Favors Daniil Medvedev

The factors that drove this prediction, measured in win-probability points.

Recent record by level +12.9 Daniil Medvedev
Surface fit +5.7 Daniil Medvedev
Serve & return game +5.1 Daniil Medvedev
Overall strength +5.1 Daniil Medvedev
Head-to-head +3.5 Daniil Medvedev

Starting from an even matchup, these factors move the model to 93% for Daniil Medvedev. Computed with gradient-based attribution on our neural network — not editorial opinion. How to read this →

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Jan-Lennard Struff

Form Index: 59.7
ELO Rating: 1658.6
Glicko2 Rating: 1631.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 348.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 15.8
Clay: 16.7
Grass: 25.1
Serve Rating: 96.5
Return Rating: 90.9

Daniil Medvedev

Form Index: 61.0
ELO Rating: 1882.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1926.9
Current Fatigue (minutes): 348.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 52.1
Clay: 28.8
Grass: 27.9
Serve Rating: 96.2
Return Rating: 89.2

Recent Matches

Jan-Lennard Struff

Daniil Medvedev

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Jan-Lennard Struff
vs
2
Daniil Medvedev
Hard
0 - 2
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

At Wimbledon in London, Round of 32 on grass, Daniil Medvedev is the clear favorite against Jan-Lennard Struff. The model projects Medvedev to win with a 92.71% probability versus 7.29% for Struff, and forecasts about 37.11 total games in the match.

Match Analysis

The model’s edge for Medvedev comes mainly from his superior recent record at this level and a better surface fit; these two factors alone swing the prediction heavily in his favor. Medvedev brings a top-10 ranking (No. 9) and an Elo of 1882, compared with Struff at No. 74 and an Elo of 1659, and both players enter in similar form (Medvedev 60.99, Struff 59.71). Those underlying class and results differentials underpin the 12.9 percentage points credited to recent record and the 5.7 points for surface fit. Serve and return balance and overall strength also contribute to the gap. Both players show elite serve indices (Struff 96.50, Medvedev 96.23) and comparable return indices (Struff 90.88, Medvedev 89.18), so neither enjoys a decisive serving edge—yet Medvedev’s higher baseline level and match experience on big stages push the serve & return factor (5.1 points) and overall strength (5.1 points) toward him. Head-to-head considerations add another 3.5 points in Medvedev’s favor. Fatigue levels are identical from this event (348 minutes on court apiece), and surface strength indices are close (Struff 25.13, Medvedev 27.87), suggesting conditioning won’t be a differential. Over the last three matches Struff has two gritty five-set wins at Wimbledon (both long affairs) and an earlier loss in Mallorca, while Medvedev has two straight wins at Wimbledon (including a 3-0 over Marin Cilic) and a loss in Halle, showing steadier results at this tournament.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 37.1 Most likely outcome: 37 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Jan-Lennard Struff - Daniil Medvedev) -6.9 Most likely spread: -7 (Daniil Medvedev wins 7 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. Positive values indicate Jan-Lennard Struff winning more games, negative values indicate Daniil Medvedev winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

Predicted aces for the match are high: the aces prediction sits at 24.72, reflecting grass as the fastest surface where big serves produce more free points. The double faults prediction is 9.59 expected double faults for the match; grass sometimes encourages riskier serving that can raise that number. Neither player posts a significantly higher serve rating, so the predicted aces are driven more by the surface and both players’ aggressive serving styles than by a single dominant server.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 24.7 Most likely: 24 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 9.6 Most likely: 9 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Jan-Lennard Struff versus Daniil Medvedev. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

56.0% Predicted: Tiebreak likely

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Jan-Lennard Struff's perspective)

0-3 Most likely set score (62.8%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Jan-Lennard Struff's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Medvedev’s advantage is driven primarily by recent record at this level (the top model key factor) coupled with his higher ranking and Elo. The key thing to watch will be how effectively Struff’s big serve pressures Medvedev early; if return games remain routine for Medvedev, the match should follow the predicted script.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel