Rome Italy Clay Masters 1000 Quarterfinals

Rafael Jodar vs Luciano Darderi: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Rafael Jodar

Rank: #34
48%
VS

Luciano Darderi

Rank: #20
52%
Expected Total Games: 27.9
Predicted Winner: Luciano Darderi

Player Metrics

Rafael Jodar

Form Index: 76.2
ELO Rating: 1916.5
Glicko2 Rating: 1914.8
Current Fatigue (minutes): 312.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 26.0
Clay: 35.9
Grass: 7.4
Serve Rating: 94.9
Return Rating: 90.7

Luciano Darderi

Form Index: 58.3
ELO Rating: 1783.3
Glicko2 Rating: 1803.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 377.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 20.5
Clay: 34.7
Grass: 15.6
Serve Rating: 94.5
Return Rating: 84.5

Recent Matches

Rafael Jodar

  • Last Match: vs Learner Tien (2-0) clay Rome 75 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Matteo Arnaldi (2-1) clay Rome 121 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Nuno Borges (2-0) clay Rome 116 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Jannik Sinner (0-2) clay Madrid 116 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Vit Kopriva (2-0) clay Madrid 78 min

Luciano Darderi

  • Last Match: vs Alexander Zverev (2-1) clay Rome 144 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Tommy Paul (2-1) clay Rome 143 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Yannick Hanfmann (2-0) clay Rome 90 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Francisco Cerundolo (0-2) clay Madrid 74 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo (2-0) clay Madrid 78 min

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Rafael Jodar
vs
0
Luciano Darderi
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

In the Rome Masters 1000 quarterfinal on clay, Luciano Darderi is narrowly tipped to beat Rafael Jodar. The model gives Darderi a 51.69% chance to win versus 48.31% for Jodar, with an expected total of about 27.9 games in the match.

Match Analysis

On paper the matchup is tight: Jodar sits at No.34 with a stronger form index (76.23) and a higher Elo (1916.49), while Darderi is ranked No.20 with lower form (58.33) and an Elo of 1783.26. Fatigue is a live factor — Darderi has accumulated 377 minutes in Rome compared with Jodar’s 312, a gap that could matter in late rallies on slow clay. Both players show similar surface strength indices (Jodar 35.92, Darderi 34.70), indicating neither has a pronounced clay advantage. Serve metrics are almost identical (mean serve index 94.92 vs 94.51), so serve power shouldn’t be a decisive swing; by contrast, Jodar’s mean return index (90.71) is notably higher than Darderi’s (84.46), a difference greater than five points that favors Jodar as the primary breaker. Over their last three matches both men are undefeated in Rome: Jodar’s wins came in shorter to mid-length matches (75, 121, 116 minutes) while Darderi has endured two marathon wins (144, 143 minutes) plus a 90-minute victory — a pattern that explains both his momentum and his greater cumulative fatigue.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 27.9 Most likely outcome: 28 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Rafael Jodar - Luciano Darderi) +0.7 Most likely spread: 0 (even number of games won)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. Positive values indicate Rafael Jodar winning more games, negative values indicate Luciano Darderi winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this clay quarterfinal is modest: predicted aces for the match are about 8.69 overall, reflecting the slow surface that suppresses free points. Expected double faults are 3.69; clay’s longer rallies and the tournament-stage fatigue make an elevated double faults prediction plausible. Neither player posts a significantly higher serve rating to push the ace count above clay norms, so the expected aces and expected double faults align with surface tendencies.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 8.7 Most likely: 8 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 3.7 Most likely: 3 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Rafael Jodar versus Luciano Darderi. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

39.4% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Rafael Jodar's perspective)

2-0 Most likely set score (36.3%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Rafael Jodar's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Darderi’s narrow edge stems from ranking and recent wins through tough opposition despite heavier court time; Jodar’s superior return and form keep this finely balanced. The key factor to watch will be whether Jodar’s returning pressure can overcome Darderi’s resilience under fatigue.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel