Roland Garros France Clay Grand Slam Round of 128

Sebastian Baez vs Roman Andres Burruchaga: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Sebastian Baez

Rank: #62
43%
VS

Roman Andres Burruchaga

Rank: #66
57%
Expected Total Games: 38.7
Predicted Winner: Roman Andres Burruchaga

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Sebastian Baez

Form Index: 30.5
ELO Rating: 1621.3
Glicko2 Rating: 1728.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 19.7
Clay: 14.7
Grass: 12.4
Serve Rating: 95.4
Return Rating: 95.6

Roman Andres Burruchaga

Form Index: 31.1
ELO Rating: 1562.1
Glicko2 Rating: 1618.7
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 9.6
Clay: 15.7
Grass: 9.5
Serve Rating: 93.9
Return Rating: 90.6

Recent Matches

Sebastian Baez

  • Last Match: vs Alex Michelsen (0-2) clay Geneva 80 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Alexander Bublik (0-2) clay Rome 59 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Jenson Brooksby (2-0) clay Rome 102 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Vilius Gaubas (0-2) clay Madrid 89 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Tomas Machac (1-2) clay Barcelona 99 min

Roman Andres Burruchaga

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

1
Sebastian Baez
vs
0
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
1 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Roland Garros in Paris returns to the main draw with a first-round clay duel in the Round of 128 between Sebastian Baez and Roman Andres Burruchaga. The model gives the edge to Burruchaga, who is forecast to win with a 57.05% probability versus 42.95% for Baez, and the match is expected to play out to roughly 38.69 total games.

Match Analysis

Baez enters ranked 62 with an Elo of 1621.3 and a form index of 30.49; Burruchaga is close behind at rank 66 with an Elo of 1562.1 and a form index of 31.11. Both players show zero cumulative tournament fatigue ahead of this encounter. Surface strength indices are similar (Baez 14.67, Burruchaga 15.65), suggesting neither has a marked clay-court advantage on paper. Baez posts a marginally higher mean serve index (95.41 vs 93.90), so there is no clear-serving dominance, but his mean return index (95.63) is notably higher than Burruchaga’s (90.58) by just over five points, which could tip tight service games toward Baez. Recent form paints contrasting short-term trajectories. Baez has 1 win and 2 losses in his last three matches, with a solid straight-sets win over Jenson Brooksby followed by defeats in Rome and Geneva. Burruchaga arrives on a three-match losing streak, including straight-set defeats in Hamburg and Rome and a 1–2 loss to Tommy Paul in Houston; the results underline vulnerability but also that these have mostly been competitive clay matches.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 38.7 Most likely outcome: 38 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Sebastian Baez - Roman Andres Burruchaga) -0.8 Most likely spread: -1 (Roman Andres Burruchaga wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. Positive values indicate Sebastian Baez winning more games, negative values indicate Roman Andres Burruchaga winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for the match is low — the model’s predicted aces total is 7.1 — while the expected double faults tally sits at about 7.94. Clay’s slower, higher bounce typically reduces aces and lengthens points, and that surface context supports the lower predicted aces and the higher expected double faults. Neither player has a significantly higher serve rating, so a big disparity in ace count is unlikely.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 7.1 Most likely: 7 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 7.9 Most likely: 7 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Sebastian Baez versus Roman Andres Burruchaga. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

32.3% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO5

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Sebastian Baez's perspective)

0-3 Most likely set score (21.7%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Sebastian Baez's perspective. Format: BO5.

Final Prediction

Burruchaga’s slight edge in the model comes from a combination of comparable baseline metrics and a marginal probabilistic tilt despite Baez’s superior return profile. The key factor to watch will be Baez’s ability to convert return pressure into breaks early—if he does, the balance could swing in his favor.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel