Geneva Switzerland Clay Atp 250 Round of 32

Sebastian Baez vs Alex Michelsen: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Sebastian Baez

Rank: #65
37%
VS

Alex Michelsen

Rank: #42
63%
Expected Total Games: 25.4
Predicted Winner: Alex Michelsen

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Sebastian Baez

Form Index: 35.5
ELO Rating: 1634.6
Glicko2 Rating: 1743.2
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 19.7
Clay: 15.2
Grass: 12.4
Serve Rating: 95.4
Return Rating: 95.6

Alex Michelsen

Form Index: 38.8
ELO Rating: 1684.8
Glicko2 Rating: 1749.8
Current Fatigue (minutes): 0.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 33.6
Clay: 11.5
Grass: 14.1
Serve Rating: 95.7
Return Rating: 87.0

Recent Matches

Sebastian Baez

  • Last Match: vs Alexander Bublik (0-2) clay Rome 59 min
  • 2nd Last Match: vs Jenson Brooksby (2-0) clay Rome 102 min
  • 3rd Last Match: vs Vilius Gaubas (0-2) clay Madrid 89 min
  • 4th Last Match: vs Tomas Machac (1-2) clay Barcelona 99 min
  • 5th Last Match: vs Carlos Alcaraz (0-2) clay Monte Carlo 69 min

Alex Michelsen

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Sebastian Baez
vs
0
Alex Michelsen
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Geneva, Switzerland — round of 32 at a 250-level clay event. Alex Michelsen is the projected winner against Sebastian Baez with a 63.18% probability to prevail (Baez 36.82%), and the model anticipates a relatively short encounter: about 25.41 total games.

Match Analysis

Michelsen arrives with the higher rank (42 vs 65) and the superior Elo (1684.84 vs 1634.60), and a slightly stronger form index (38.83 vs 35.46). Both players show zero cumulative fatigue in this tournament. Surface strength indexes are modest for each — Baez 15.24, Michelsen 11.52 — suggesting neither has a pronounced clay-court dominance coming into Geneva. Their mean serve indices are nearly identical (Baez 95.36 vs Michelsen 95.68), so there is no clear serving gulf to decide the match; however Baez holds a materially better mean return index (95.61) than Michelsen (86.95), a difference of roughly 8.65 points that could be decisive on a slow, return-friendly surface. Recent form on clay is mixed. Baez’s last three matches include a straight-sets loss to Alexander Bublik in Rome, a solid 2-0 win over Jenson Brooksby, and an earlier defeat in Madrid; his results read as inconsistent but capable of high-level returning. Michelsen has struggled in his last two clay outings (losses to Sebastian Ofner and Jiri Lehecka) after a win over Jan-Lennard Struff in Madrid, indicating flashes of quality but also vulnerability on the surface. Both players’ recent matches were on clay, so current clay form is directly comparable.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 25.4 Most likely outcome: 25 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Sebastian Baez - Alex Michelsen) -1.6 Most likely spread: -2 (Alex Michelsen wins 2 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. Positive values indicate Sebastian Baez winning more games, negative values indicate Alex Michelsen winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction sits low: predicted aces for the match are 6.69, reflecting clay’s tendency to suppress outright serves. The expected double faults are 4.73; on slow courts and through longer rallies, double faults can creep up. Neither player has a significantly higher serve rating, so the predicted aces should remain modest rather than inflated by a dominant big server.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 6.7 Most likely: 6 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.7 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Sebastian Baez versus Alex Michelsen. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

🎯 Match Format Predictions

Tiebreak Likelihood

Probability that any tiebreak is played in this match

27.7% Predicted: No tiebreak

Exact Score Distribution BO3

Probability of each set-by-set outcome (Sebastian Baez's perspective)

0-2 Most likely set score (41.9%)
Probability distribution of the final set score from Sebastian Baez's perspective. Format: BO3.

Final Prediction

Michelsen’s higher rank and Elo edge, plus slightly better form, tilt the model in his favor, but Baez’s markedly superior return rating is the key X-factor. Watch the opening service games and Baez’s ability to pressure serve — that will likely decide whether Michelsen’s margin holds.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel