Madrid Spain Clay Masters 1000 Round of 16

Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Casper Ruud: AI Prediction | Games, Spread, Aces & Double Faults

Stefanos Tsitsipas

Rank: #80
40%
VS

Casper Ruud

Rank: #15
60%
Expected Total Games: 24.3
Predicted Winner: Casper Ruud

Also available in Claude. Query these predictions in plain language — our native connector lets Claude call our models on demand, no code.

Set it up

Player Metrics

Stefanos Tsitsipas

Form Index: 67.2
ELO Rating: 1719.1
Glicko2 Rating: 1719.1
Current Fatigue (minutes): 299.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 55.7
Clay: 43.7
Grass: 41.1
Serve Rating: 77.1
Return Rating: 58.4

Casper Ruud

Form Index: 59.8
ELO Rating: 1810.2
Glicko2 Rating: 1802.6
Current Fatigue (minutes): 145.0
Surface Strength:
Hard: 58.4
Clay: 47.7
Grass: 46.0
Serve Rating: 97.3
Return Rating: 86.2

Recent Matches

Stefanos Tsitsipas

Casper Ruud

Head-to-Head (Last 2 Seasons)

0
Stefanos Tsitsipas
vs
0
Casper Ruud
Hard
0 - 0
Clay
0 - 0
Grass
0 - 0

Key Prediction Insights

Madrid, clay — Round of 16 at a Masters 1000 event sets up a compelling contrast: Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Casper Ruud. The model favors Ruud (59.74%) over Tsitsipas (40.26%) and projects a relatively brief encounter with an expected 24.27 total games.

Match Analysis

Ruud arrives as the higher-ranked player (No. 15) with an Elo of 1810.15; Tsitsipas is 80th with an Elo of 1719.15. Tsitsipas shows a stronger short-term form index (67.21) than Ruud (59.85), but Ruud holds edges in surface strength (47.73 vs 43.71) and, importantly, in serve and return tools. The mean serve index gap is substantial (Ruud 97.32 vs Tsitsipas 77.06), a difference well over five points; Ruud’s mean return index is also markedly higher (86.25 vs 58.36), another gap that stands out. Fatigue is a clear factor: Tsitsipas has logged 299 minutes already in Madrid versus Ruud’s 145, which could influence late-match consistency on clay. Over their last three matches at clay events here and recently, Tsitsipas has been unbeaten in Madrid (three wins: two straight sets and a longer three-setter), showing resilience but with a heavy minutes load (notably a 158-minute match). Ruud has won his two Madrid matches in straight sets and arrives off an earlier clay loss in Monte Carlo; his recent results indicate controlled baseline play and efficiency in closing matches.

Total Games Predictions

🎾
Expected Total Games in Match 24.3 Most likely outcome: 24 games

📊 Total Games Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each total games outcome

Probability distribution chart for total games in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. The X-axis shows possible total games values and the Y-axis shows the predicted probability percentage for each outcome.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of total games ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total games in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. The curve rises from 0% to 100%, showing the cumulative probability for each games total threshold.

Games Spread Predictions

📈
Expected Games Spread (Stefanos Tsitsipas - Casper Ruud) +1.1 Most likely spread: +1 (Stefanos Tsitsipas wins 1 more games)

📊 Games Spread Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each games spread outcome

Probability distribution chart for games spread in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. Positive values indicate Stefanos Tsitsipas winning more games, negative values indicate Casper Ruud winning more games.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of spread ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for games spread in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each spread threshold.

Aces and Double Faults Predictions

The aces prediction for this match sits at 18.34 total and the double faults prediction at 4.9 expected double faults. On slow, high-bounce clay, predicted aces are depressed compared with faster surfaces, though Ruud’s significantly higher serve rating suggests he will contribute a larger share of those aces. Conversely, the clay grind and Tsitsipas’ higher minutes make the expected double faults a plausible issue later in rallies.
🎯
Expected Total Aces 18.3 Most likely: 18 aces
Expected Total Double Faults 4.9 Most likely: 4 double faults

🎯 Aces Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each ace count outcome

Probability distribution chart for total aces in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. Higher ace counts are more likely on faster surfaces like grass.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of aces ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for total aces in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each aces threshold.

Double Faults Probability Distribution

Distribution

Probability of each double fault count outcome

Probability distribution chart for double faults in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. Clay surface matches tend to produce more double faults due to fatigue in longer rallies.
Cumulative Probability (CDF)

Probability of double faults ≤ X

Cumulative distribution function chart for double faults in Stefanos Tsitsipas versus Casper Ruud. The curve shows the cumulative probability for each double faults threshold.

Final Prediction

Ruud’s combination of superior serve and return metrics and fresher legs gives him the edge in Madrid. The key factor to watch is whether Tsitsipas’ accumulated court time undermines his serve consistency—if it does, Ruud’s higher return index should decide the tie.

Get Daily Tennis Predictions

Enjoyed this analysis? Subscribe to our Telegram channel and receive daily AI-driven tennis predictions directly on your phone.

Join Our Telegram Channel